<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; santa anita</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farewelltokings.com/tag/santa-anita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farewelltokings.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breeders&#8217; Cup Wrap-UP</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careless Jewel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conduit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing In Silk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forever Together]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review and recap of the 2009 Breeders' Cup race results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been debating about putting up a <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> post today because there really isn&#8217;t too much left to say that hasn&#8217;t already been said in 1,000 other places by now.   Nevertheless I think I&#8217;d feel like something was missing if I didn&#8217;t say a few words at least:</p>
<ul>
<li>Santa Anita &#8211; Wow!  For those of you who go there routinely I guess this goes without saying, but WOW (did I say that already?!)&#8230;what a view!  Those mountains make for a breathtaking backdrop.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_226" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-226" title="Mountains" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC1-300x225.jpg" alt="Wow!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wow!</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Pro-Ride &#8211; Is there any doubt at this point that this is a completely separate surface that bears no resemblance to dirt, plays more like turf, and is extremely difficult to navigate for dirt horses with no past turf or synthetic experience?  When you see consistent horses with strong dirt form completely fail to fire time after time that&#8217;s telling you something.  You know the facts by now &#8211; not a single dirt horse won or even ran well.  Consistent dirt horses like Music Note, Sara Louise, Summer Bird, D&#8217;Funnybone, Devil May Care etc etc all failed to display anywhere near their established form over this track.  Bottom line &#8211; these races mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things when it comes to dirt horses.  For all intents and purposes you need to treat them the same way you&#8217;d treat a grass race for these horses.  America is built around dirt racing so it&#8217;s just sad to see us run prominent and championship races on an entirely different surface that holds no historical value or relative significance.  In addition, you can now view some of the performances from last year (ie &#8211; Curlin) through an even more colored lense and realize those races are dead throwouts.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_225" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-225" title="Pro-Ride" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC2-300x225.jpg" alt="What is this stuff?" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">What is this stuff?</p></div>
<div id="attachment_228" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCpr.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-228" title="BCpr" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCpr-300x225.jpg" alt="This really isn't my living room carpet!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This really isn&#39;t my living room carpet!</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Marathon &#8211; If not for the fact that some of these horses were coming from Europe you&#8217;d otherwise be hard-pressed to distinguish this race from the Gallant Fox Handicap in December at Aqueduct.  Just silly.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Filllies Turf &#8211; Why?  Surprised no one closed into pretty fast fractions.  Nice effort by Rose Catherine stretching out off that sensational debut in a turf sprint at Belmont.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Fillies &#8211; Zzzzzzz.  Lots of horses in the picture.  No one all that impressive.  Not sure this race means much in the grand scheme of things except to the winners.  Tough trip for Biofuel (who I bet of course) going 100 wide and getting sideswiped as she was making her move&#8230;and still closing well for 4th.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>F&amp;M Turf &#8211; Midday figured better than these if Forever Together didn&#8217;t return to peak form.  Forever Together didn&#8217;t and Midday was.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>F&amp;M Sprint &#8211; Some people must be looking at an $8.80 payoff for 7-for-7 on synthetics Informed Decision and thinking &#8220;Wow&#8230;what an easy game&#8221; but this race was as much about pace as anything else.  The race was essentially over after the first quarter as  Informed Decision sat just off a slow 23:1 quarter while probably-best Ventura attempted to close from the back of the pack.  Sara Louise had nothing on the pro-ride.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_227" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCid.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-227" title="Informed Decision" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCid-300x225.jpg" alt="Informed Decision" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Informed Decision</p></div>
<ul>
<li>DISTAFF(!) &#8211; Not sure if Careless Jewel was just entirely rank or another with non Pro-Ride/Keeneland type synthetic experience (Woodbine is a bit of a different surface than those) who also didn&#8217;t handle the surface.  Either way, the Rachel Alexandra comparisons should stop for a while.  She should still make for a nice 4 yo if they stick to the dirt.  Obviously this was one that fell apart from the fast pace as Life Is Sweet came from the back to blow by the field.  Seeing a potent finisher like Music Note lack a strong closing punch again validates the stark  contrast in the surface.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Turf &#8211; Whatever.  Congrats to the connections I guess.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf Sprint &#8211; Was hoping for chaos again but California Flag looked best if he could avoid an early duel.  Able to get away with a slow 21:2 quarter (well slow compared to last year&#8217;s 20:3 duel) he cruised home.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Sprint &#8211; Just bet the fastest last race Beyer.  Easy game, right?!  Zensational got off a bit slow and couldn&#8217;t make the lead and showed little thereafter so obviously they decided to rest on their laurels and retire him.  After all what&#8217;s left to prove after you decisively beat Talking to MomRoo?  Fatal Bullet threw in his first synthetic clunker after everything seemed to set up well for him.  Champion Sprinter for $100, Alex?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile &#8211; I&#8217;ll leave out the fact that I was alive with 7 of these in the Pick-4 (including Piscitelli for 90k who led through slow fractions and then re-rallied in midstretch) and missed it when I picked the wrong Euros to be my &#8220;A&#8217;s&#8221; (the Sprint eliminated my B&#8217;s in this race &#8211; which Vale of York was) and just say that obviously Lookin At Lucky lost nothing in defeat here.  I&#8217;m sure this race has some Santa Anita Derby or San Felipe  implications or something&#8230;but not much else.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf Mile &#8211; Another pretty impressive performance by Goldikova who was obviously back on her &#8220;A&#8221; game.  Clearly one of the all-time good turf fillies, however I still wouldn&#8217;t put her near Miesque who ran faster, had a better career overall, and beat significantly better fields in her back-to-back triumphs.    Check out the fact that Miesque ran exclusively against males in the final EIGHT starts of her career &#8211; compiling a record of 6 wins and 2 seconds against a very deep and talented group (both in Europe &amp; the US).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Dirt Mile &#8211; Wide open race if Mastercraftsman didn&#8217;t fire.  Furthest Land obviously ran back to his last race.  Ridiculous to run this race in the heart of the Saturday card.  In other news, the &#8220;Dirt Mile&#8221; remains on target to actually be run at 1 Mile on the dirt for the first time next year.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf &#8211; Pretty uninteresting race.  Amazing they can only get 7 horses (and just 3 from the US) to run for 3 Million Dollars on the grass.  Conduit wasn&#8217;t nearly as good this year as he was last year but it was still enough to get the job done.  Precious Passion is definitely a cool horse who has obviously improved quite a bit and become way more consistent.  It&#8217;s rare to see a horse do what he does on the turf so he&#8217;s definitely fun to watch.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_229" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC4.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-229" title="BC4" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC4-300x225.jpg" alt="The Classic!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Classic!</p></div>
<div id="attachment_230" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC5.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-230" title="Zenyatta" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC5-300x225.jpg" alt="Zenyatta" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zenyatta</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Classic &#8211; Well <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Zenyatta</a> certainly surprised me.  I didn&#8217;t expect her to win going in and she certainly looked beaten throughout most of the race but she managed to blow by the field and make history.  The moment gave you goosebumps and the cheering from the crowd reminded me of a playoff game atmosphere after a game-typing basket or Home Run which is remarkable to see at a racetrack.  Nevertheless my analytical side can&#8217;t help but view this effort in a slightly different context.  At the end of the day Zenyatta beat a field of primarily turf horses on a surface that almost none of them had run their best efforts over (Gio Ponti&#8217;s best efforts are on grass, Twice Over&#8217;s also on grass, &amp; Summer Bird&#8217;s on dirt).  If Summer Bird faced Gio Ponti and Twice Over going 10 furlongs on the dirt, would you still bet him to run last of the 3?  Clearly Zenyatta is the queen of synthetics but I just can&#8217;t treat that the same way that I&#8217;d treat a horse who accomplished the same thing on dirt.  It&#8217;s a niche surface and it&#8217;s less significant than dirt.  Zenyatta very well might be as good on dirt but unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t look like we&#8217;ll ever get the chance to find out.</li>
</ul>
<p>I obviously have a lot more to say about Zenyatta and the Classic and I plan to cover Zenyatta and why <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Rachel Alexandra</a> is still <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Horse of the Year</a> in separate posts.  I&#8217;ll also give some thoughts on the <a href="../" target="_blank">2009 Eclipse Award</a> picture later in the week as well.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30,000 Foot Look at the Breeders&#8217; Cup</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upcoming Races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyer Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pure Clan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My view on the Breeders' Cup races from 30,000 feet.  From the value in Pick 4's to why Zenyatta is a horrible favorite for the Breeders Cup Classic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Literally.  On my way to California &#8211; gotta love in-flight Wifi.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written extensively about the Breeders&#8217; Cup as it pertains to <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/a-look-at-the-2009-horse-of-the-year-picture/" target="_blank">Horse of the Year</a>, <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/historical-breeders-cup-beyers/" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup Beyer Speed Figures</a> and  <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/" target="_blank">Fixing the Breeders&#8217; Cup</a>, but I&#8217;ve purposely been rather silent about this year&#8217;s <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> from a handicapping point of view because my only real opinion is that most of these races are incredibly wide-open and most favorites and short-priced horses are quite vulnerable.  The synthetic aspect really complicates things from a handicapping perspective, but it makes them awfully appealing from a betting perspective.</p>
<p>How will the dirt horses do 1st time on synthetic?  How will the turf horses do making their debuts on pro-ride&#8230;will their form carry over?  Are speed figures really less relevant on synthetics to the extent that a slower horse with a strong finishing kick can beat a faster horse?  Interesting questions and they all present opportunities for value.  Should these races be chalky I don&#8217;t envision myself having a very good weekend.</p>
<p>Here are some very quick thoughts:</p>
<p><strong>Marathon:</strong> What a ridiculous race.  Calling this a Breeders&#8217; Cup race dilutes the name.  With that said, I&#8217;d probably key around Father Time, Mastery, Man of Iron &amp; Gangbuster while covering Muhnnak, Nite Light, Cloudy&#8217;s Knight, &amp; Eldaffer to a smaller degree.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Turf Fillies </strong>- I&#8217;ll be hoping for a bomb here as I could make a case for 12 of the 14, however House of Grace is the one I probably prefer most.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Fillies</strong> &#8211; Looks wide open to me and again I&#8217;m spreading and hoping to catch a big price.  Blind Luck, Beautician, Connie &amp; Mike, She Be Wild, Negligee, Always a Princess, and maybe Biofuel.  I&#8217;ll use Connie and Michael the heaviest from a defensive perspective as she seems the most talented.</p>
<p><strong>F&amp;M Turf</strong> &#8211; Forever Together still intrigues me and 10 furlongs and a firm turf could offer her the right conditions to fire again.  Otherwise most of the rest look pretty close aside from Midday who might be better than these.  Not a lot of pace so I&#8217;m curious to see if someone tries to steal it.  Maram is another who intrigues me.  She&#8217;s slower than several strong closers like Pure Clan &amp; Magical Fantasy but she&#8217;s a rare one who seems like she&#8217;ll be more effective with added distance and would have a more potent kick going longer.  Not a throwout at all.</p>
<p><strong>F&amp;M Sprint</strong> &#8211; Ventura is probably better than these.  Curious to see how Sara Louise handles pro-ride bc she&#8217;s as good as any if she does and obviously Informed Decision is at her best going 7F on synthetics.</p>
<p><strong>Ladies Classic</strong> &#8211; D-I-S-T-A-F-F!  I actually think this race is pretty wide open.  I&#8217;m not in love with Careless Jewel who has been meeting very soft fields and doesn&#8217;t have pro-ride/Keeneland type of experience.  Music Note ran a 98 Beyer on pro-ride last year and is clearly faster this year, however I don&#8217;t love the fact that her closing kick seemed less potent on pro-ride for some reason.  Torn on her.  Mushka, Proviso, Life Is Sweet &amp; Rainbow View are also usable.  Yes that&#8217;s almost everyone but that&#8217;s what A-B-C tickets are for.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Turf</strong> &#8211; Viscount Nelson, Codoy, Pounced, Gallant Gent, King Ledley, Becky&#8217;s Kitten, Interactif, Buzzword, Bridgetown, Awesome Act.  Bomb please!</p>
<p><strong>Turf Sprint</strong> &#8211; I loved this race last year by settling on Storm Treasure to close into what I knew would be an insane pace and used him in the money in triples and caught a bomb winning with Desert Code.  There doesn&#8217;t appear to be quite as much speed this year but with so much potential for chaos in a race like this I can&#8217;t play California Flag.  If he doesn;t run his best and Diamondrella doesnt get an insane pace to run into, hopefully something wacky can happen again.</p>
<p><strong>Sprint</strong> &#8211; I kinda like Fatal Bullet.  Obviously he&#8217;s a different horse on synthetics and I think he can sit just off Zensational and run at him in the stretch.  I&#8217;d love to play heavily against Zensational who has benefited from soft trips/pace scenarios without running especially fast, but it&#8217;s a pretty weak field and other than Fatal Bullet there&#8217;s not a ton of speed to run with him and he&#8217;s clearly better capable of firing a big fig at 6F than 7F.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile</strong> &#8211; If Looking At Lucky wins, I lose.  He&#8217;s a nice horse and it wouldn&#8217;t stun me if he wins but from a value perspective he&#8217;s a horrible play.  There are a number of others who are as fast, faster, or moving forward and intriguing.  Noble&#8217;s Promise (might not love this distance &#8211; by Cuvee &#8211; even though he ran a figure good enough to win at same distance last out), D&#8217;Funnybone (if he handles pro-ride), Pulsion (moving forward and by Include which indicates he should continue to develop with time and distance), Eskendereya (don&#8217;t love Pletcher on pro-ride but this one is fast and ran well on turf already), Aikenite (big fig at Keeneland on synths and moving forward), + you have Euros with turf form.</p>
<p><strong>Mile</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ll use but try to beat Goldiskova who has been in and out this year and was more visually impressive than fast in winning last year (albeit with a pretty powerful closing kick).  I could name a ton of horses I&#8217;ll be using here but suffice to say I&#8217;ll be going pretty deep and spreading and hoping for a price.</p>
<p><strong>Dirt Mile</strong> &#8211; Pretty funny that in 3 years the &#8220;Dirt Mile&#8221; has never actually been run at a mile on the dirt.  Speaks volumes about the current absurdity that is the Breeders&#8217; Cup.  You have to like Mastercraftsman.  Beyond that it looks pretty wide open to me.</p>
<p><strong>Turf</strong> &#8211; No genius ideas here&#8230;I think Conduit is a pretty strong candidate to repeat.   Beyond that I can really only make a case for Dar Re Mi, Spanish Moon &amp; Precious Passion.</p>
<p><strong>Classic</strong> &#8211; Pretend you had been out of racing for 2 years and you called me up and said &#8220;I see it&#8217;s Breeders&#8217; Cup day&#8230;tell me about the favorite for the Classic?&#8221;  And I replied &#8220;Well&#8230;it&#8217;s a mare who is coming off Beyers of 97 and 99 in her last 2 races, beat the longest priced horse in the morning line for the Distaff by a length in her last race and beat an allowance type horse by a head in her race before that &#8211; AND has never been 1 1/4 miles before and has only run 1 1/8 once this year in June.  Does that sound like enough of  a story to bring you back into action?</p>
<p>Look, Zenyatta is wonderfully talented horse and the source of one of the most complex evaluations of a &#8220;great&#8221; in history &#8211; but she is HORRIBLE value in this race.  This race should serve as a fascinating test for the question of how relevant are speed figures/performance figures on pro-ride and is this a rare example of a horse who literally does just what it takes to win?  If you take 2-1 or less to find out then you&#8217;re betting with your heart and not your head.  From a value perspective, there&#8217;s tons here.  I think Richard&#8217;s Kid looks like a great play to at least hit the board (which in and of itself speaks to the absurdity of this Breeders&#8217; Cup) and perhaps create some big triples if Zenyatta&#8217;s out of the money.  I also like Colonel John, Einstein, &amp; the Euros (who will probably win but won&#8217;t offer nearly as much value this time around).  Not sure what to do with Gio Ponti who wasn&#8217;t very fast on pro-ride in the winter but seems to have improved since then.  Also fascinating to see what happens with Quality Road &amp; Summer Bird who are both immensely talented and pretty consistent dirt horses.  On dirt they would clearly be the 2 favorites.  Should neither run well it will make for a pretty glaring example of the differences between dirt form and pro-ride form &#8211; particularly in the case of horses without previous experience on the surface or on grass.</p>
<p>I wrote more than I though there but there&#8217;s plenty of time to kill on this 5 1/2 hour flight &#8211; and anything to distract me from these wildly uncomfortable seats on American Airlines.</p>
<p>My plan is to focus on Pick 4&#8242;s and spread pretty deeply using the standard A-B-C-X ticket style and swing for the fences.  I love these types of days because with the big fields and public money, a bomb or two and favorites losing can produce 50k-100k pick-4 payoffs.  Obviously you need to make fairly large investments, but the potential rewards are enormous on Breeders&#8217; Cup day for those with a big enough bankroll &#8211; and this year even more than normal because of all the uncertainties associated with running on pro-ride.  As a fan, I detest it.  As a bettor, I like it!</p>
<p>Good luck to all and may the horse be with you!</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Fix the Breeders&#8217; Cup</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Breeders' Cup is broken, folks.  Not irreversibly, but it's getting there.  The good thing is that it can be fixed in 3 simple steps.  Let's fix it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By this time next year, three years will have passed  since there was a single <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> race that took place on dirt.  THREE  YEARS!!!  That&#8217;s as sad as it is unbelievable!  Some championship&#8230;  Not to mention the fact that I&#8217;ve  yet to encounter a single person who prefers the term &#8220;Ladies Classic&#8221; to  Distaff.  The various  &#8221;improvements&#8221; bestowed upon us by the erstwhile  powers-that-be have thoroughly diluted this once great event.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  The Breeders&#8217; Cup is broken, folks.  Not irreversibly, but it&#8217;s getting there.  The good thing is that it can be fixed in 3 simple steps.  Let&#8217;s fix it.</p>
<p>Since those in charge currently seem to be contemplating how to plan the event for the  future I propose the following simple and easy ground rules to restore the event to its rightful place as a day that racing fans can truly look forward to:</p>
<p>1)  <strong>The Breeders&#8217; Cup should not be a 2-day event.</strong> In this case two halves  do NOT exceed one whole.  In fact, they seldom do.  I remember when Belmont used  to run &#8220;Super Saturday&#8221; cards in the fall combining all of their major Grade 1  races into a single card.  They were exciting.  Then they tried to spread the  races out over an entire weekend.  It didn&#8217;t work.  They turned into ordinary  racing days with several stakes races run.  Racing isn&#8217;t popular enough anymore to  support too many big days.  You need to hit it out of the park when it counts.   Most of the world could give a crap about the &#8220;Ladies Classic,&#8221; let alone the  &#8220;Juvenile Fillies Turf.&#8221;  There&#8217;s simply no reason other than desperate  economics (read: short term gain, long term pain) to try to stretch the event into a Friday afternoon.</p>
<p>Run the Breeders&#8217; Cup on Saturday like they used to &#8211; with only the most  important races.  Make that card so strong that the rest of the racing world  (and some of the rest of the world as well) stops to pay attention &#8211; like they used to.  Only run races significant enough  to be Grade 1&#8242;s &#8211; like they used to.  How pathetic is it that they now run Breeders&#8217; Cup races that can&#8217;t even be called Grade 1&#8242;s with a straight face?  Isn&#8217;t there some saying about &#8220;if it ain&#8217;t  broke&#8230;?&#8221;  Here&#8217;s another thought: If you draw a field where you can&#8217;t immediately tell if  the race is being run on Breeders&#8217; Cup day or a month later at Aqueduct when looking at the entrants and past performances, then you&#8217;ve done something seriously wrong and the  race probably doesn&#8217;t deserve to be part of the Breeders Cup card!!!</p>
<p>2)  <strong>Let&#8217;s nix the marathon, turf sprint, dirt  mile, juvenile turf, and juvenile fillies turf. </strong> None of these are championship  events.  Look at the fields.  Look at the winners so far.  These are no elite  races and the horses winning these races aren&#8217;t elite horses .  The only thing the Breeders Cup was  missing was a filly &amp; mare sprint.  That&#8217;s an Eclipse Award category and  there are legit Grade 1 horses ready to run in such a race.  Keep it.  No one  was asking for any of these other races.  They don&#8217;t fill any void.  None of  these other races determine Eclipse Awards, draw G1 fields, or serve any  legitimate purpose other than to waste purse money and serve as a desperate attempt to get a second day out of the BC by calling them Breeders&#8217; Cup events.  Run these other events as  non-Breeders&#8217; Cup stakes races on the day before or day after if you must, but  stop diluting the main event with this silliness that more resemble the Calder  Festival of Racing where they run 2 furlong and 2 mile races simultaneously in opposite directions  than  they do championship events where we&#8217;ve seen some of the greatest races in the  history of the sport.</p>
<p>3)  <strong>No Breeders&#8217; Cup can be run at a track that doesn&#8217;t have dirt.</strong> I&#8217;m  sorry but it&#8217;s absolutely ridiculous to pass off an event as a determinant of  champions when not a single dirt race is run.  This is America for god sakes &#8211; here we  run on dirt!  Synthetics are a third surface and they need to be treated as  such.  Last year you saw Eclipse voters ignore most of the Breeders&#8217; Cup results  for this reason.  This year, it&#8217;s gone a step further and many top horses are  deliberately skipping the event because it&#8217;s on synthetics.  California rushed  to judgment and installed synthetic courses throughout the state.  That&#8217;s their  problem.  They made their bed and they should have to lie in it &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t mean the rest of the sport has to suffer.  Perhaps we should create a separate Eclipse for synthetic horses (for at least as long as they last),  but let&#8217;s bring these races back to a time where they actually mattered and  actually represented a level playing field from which to settle rivalries and  help determine year-end championships.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for drastic action because you can see the downward trend developing right before you.  In a matter of 2 years they have essentially torn down all of what they spent 2 decades building up.  The Breeders&#8217; Cup is on a fast track towards being nothing more than a series of big money events with no other real value rather than the biggest day in racing and a series of &#8220;can&#8217;t miss&#8221; races (for the Eclipse contenders as well as the fans).</p>
<p>1 Day.  9 Championship races.  Dirt.  Not so hard, is it?!  All in favor, say I&#8230;</p>
<p>===============================</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Surfaces Are NOT Equal</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/all-surfaces-are-not-equal/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/all-surfaces-are-not-equal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breeders' cup sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keeneland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any handicapper with half a brain knows that turf form and dirt form are two entirely different animals (pardon the pun).  Occasionally you&#8217;ll find a horse that possesses equal ability on both surfaces, but it&#8217;s rare.  Much more common is a horse who is significantly stronger on one surface than the other, yet recently with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any handicapper with half a brain knows that turf form and dirt form are two entirely different animals (pardon the pun).  Occasionally you&#8217;ll find a horse that possesses equal ability on both surfaces, but it&#8217;s rare.  Much more common is a horse who is significantly stronger on one surface than the other, yet recently with the introduction of synthetic surfaces, some people seem to be condemning poor efforts on synthetics with the absurd notion that &#8220;a good horse can run on anything.&#8221;  Clearly Cigar wasn&#8217;t a good horse!  This is purely nonsense of course but I see it over and over &#8211; particularly in reference to last year&#8217;s Breeders&#8217; Cup where virtually every &#8220;main track&#8221; race was won by a horse with turf or previous synthetic experience.  With the Breeders&#8217; Cup back at Santa Anita again, I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll be hearing more of the same.  It&#8217;s even been used against Rachel Alexandra as though she&#8217;s &#8220;ducking&#8221; Zenyatta &#8211; despite the fact that such a race would have absolutely no relevance to her dirt ability.</p>
<p>For anyone who still wants to press the case that &#8220;a good horse can run on anything,&#8221; the defense offers up Exhibits A, B, C, &amp; D in the form of<strong> Fatal Bullet</strong>.</p>
<p>In 10 career starts on synthetics Fatal Bullet has a record of 8 wins and 2 seconds.   One of those losses was a second in last year&#8217;s Breeders&#8217; Cup Sprint at Santa Anita.    In his last 5 synthetic starts Fatal Bullet has run Beyers of 109-107-108-100-107.</p>
<p>In 2 career starts on dirt Fatal Bullet is 0 for 2 &#8211; having finished 6th and 8th, beaten a combined 34 3/4 lengths.  In those 2 starts he ran Beyer figures of 65 and 71 which would make him overmatched in many low level claiming races.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Last time out Fatal Bullet ran dead last in the Alfred G Vanderbilt at Saratoga beaten nearly 18 lengths running a Beyer figure of 65 without encountering any major trouble.  Entered back today in the Phoenix at Keeneland it figured to make for a excellent test.  Surely a horse coming off a 65 BSF would have a tough time beating veteran G3 sprinters who routinely run 100+ unless that performance was a total fluke.  Well&#8230;he did bounce back &#8211; beating Capt. Candyman Can (BSF&#8217;s of 103-105 in his 2 prior starts) by 1/2 length and likely reverting right back to that 105-110 BSF range.</p>
<p>Is it possible that a horse as consistent as Fatal Bullet happened to run 15 to 20 lengths slower in both of his dirt starts by pure random chance?  Well if you believe that then I very much look forward to seeing you on line next to me at the betting windows! <img src='http://farewelltokings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/all-surfaces-are-not-equal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

