<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Gio Ponti</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farewelltokings.com/tag/gio-ponti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farewelltokings.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Horses of the Decade: 2000-2009</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/12/horses-of-the-decade-2000-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/12/horses-of-the-decade-2000-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afleet Alex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azeri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernardini]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantastic Light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghostzapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halfbridled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Chaparral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kona Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mineshaft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orientate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ouija Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Point Given]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riboletta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saint Liam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smarty Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storm Flag Flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweet Catamine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tempera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Pass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to look back on a fascinating decade of racing and crunch some PP's to figure out the best of the best in each category for 2000-2009.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I skipped the customary Christmas Day movie/Chinese Food routine, so what better time to look back on a fascinating decade of racing and crunch some PP&#8217;s to figure out the best of the best in each category.</p>
<p>Annual Eclipse Awards are sometimes difficult because there are no clear guidelines in how to comparatively assess ability vs accomplishment.  The general understanding is to simply measure the strength of the overall campaign (although this logic seems to have fallen by the wayside for <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/tag/zenyatta/" target="_blank">Zenyatta</a> supporters when it comes to the <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/12/zenyatta-horse-of-the-year-and-11-3/" target="_blank">Zenyatta vs Rachel Alexandra</a> debate for <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/tag/2009-horse-of-the-year/" target="_blank">2009 Horse of the Year</a>). Selecting a champion for the decade is even more difficult because you&#8217;re facing the same questions multiplied by 10.  How do you treat a horse who had the most accomplished championship year vs a horse who was clearly the best and most talented champion but perhaps slightly less accomplished?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go with a blended answer and take a little from both sides.  My list of champions for the decade are determined by seeing who rises to the top at the intersection between ability and accomplishment.  I will limit it to their individual championship years and not how they performed outside of those years.</p>
<p><strong>2 Year Old Colt</strong> &#8211; This has to be <strong>War Pass</strong> who was absolutely brilliant is going 4-for-4 including G1 wins in the Champagne and Breeders&#8217; Cup and recorded Beyers of 103 and 113 in those races.</p>
<p><strong>2 Year Old Female</strong> -  I have to narrowly give this to <strong>Storm Flag Flying</strong> who was sensational as a 2 year old in going 4-for-4 with 3 Grade 1 wins (Matron, Frizette, Breeders&#8217; Cup) and ran fast in the process (94-98-102 BSF&#8217;s).  Storm Flag Flying seemed to be getting better and looked poised to become an  all-time superstar before developing some issues at 3, subsequently getting hurt and never really regaining that elite form when she came back.  Closely behind is Halfbridled who was also sensational as a 2yo filly.  Sweet Catamine and Tempera were both extremely fast and quite good but they both lost races unlike the top 2.</p>
<p><strong>3 Year Old Colt</strong> &#8211; What a tough call as most of these had somewhat incomplete seasons.  Tiznow only won 2 Grade 1&#8242;s.  Same with Smarty Jones and Afleet Alex.  Curlin won 3 Grade 1&#8242;s in a 6-for9 season.    Bernardini won 3 Grade 1&#8242;s in a 6-for-8 season.   My winner is <strong>Point Given</strong> who won 5 Grade 1&#8242;s and Horse of the Year in a 6-for-7 season that was cut short by injury.  His only loss was in the Derby where he inexplicably didn&#8217;t fire after making a big middle move &#8211; but his overall record was as good as anyone, his accomplishments as strong as anyone, and he won 2 more Grade 1&#8242;s than anyone else during the decade.</p>
<p><strong>3 Year Old Filly</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/tag/rachel-alexandra/" target="_blank"><strong>Rachel Alexandra</strong></a>&#8230;by as big a margin as she won the Kentucky Oaks &amp; Mother Goose.</p>
<p><strong>Older Male </strong>- Another difficult call in comparing ability and accomplishment as only Saint Liam and Mineshaft (and now Gio Ponti &#8211; who is not considered because his wins were on turf) won 4 Grade 1&#8242;s.   Saint Liam was generally not brilliant and certainly wouldn&#8217;t make for a popular choice.  Mineshaft had an extremely strong year going 7-for-9, winning in January through September, and running fast.  But he passed on the Breeders&#8217; Cup and beat a fairly weak group (Quest, Hold That Tiger, Volponi, Western Pride, American Style, Olmodavor, Learned, Halo&#8217;s Tiger, Revised Note ran 2nd in his wins) so a little luster is lost.</p>
<p>Mineshaft is still probably the most logical winner but I cannot vote against <strong>Ghostzapper</strong> who was simply incredible in his short 4 win Horse of the Year  season.  His accomplishments were obviously less than some others, but he was as talented as any horse to run since Spectacular Bid and lengths better than any other horse to run this decade.  His Breeders&#8217; Cup was the fastest Classic ever and he beat a very strong field in what was, amazingly, just his 2nd career start around 2-turns and first time ever running 10 furlongs.  He&#8217;s my choice.</p>
<p><strong>Older Filly/Mare</strong> &#8211; Had she not ran horribly in the Breeders&#8217; Cup I&#8217;d give the nod to the often-forgotten Riboletta who was as good as just about any filly or mare in years for a few months in 2000.   She was 7-for-11 that year (with 2 of those losses coming on turf)  with Beyers of 115-115-111-110.   But with her glaring 7th place finish in the Breeders&#8217; Cup, this becomes a toss-up between Zenyatta&#8217;s 7-for-7 season in 2008 (4 Grade 1&#8242;s) and Azeri&#8217;s 8-for-9 season in 2002 (5 Grade 1&#8242;s).  Ability-wise they were pretty similar &#8211; with <strong>Azeri</strong> perhaps a touch faster than year.  Neither campaign was super aggressive.  Azeri won 1 more race, and 1 more Grade 1, but she also lost a race while Zenyatta didn&#8217;t.  But because of those extra wins and the fact that she was slightly more dominant in her victories and didn&#8217;t earn most of her wins over synthetics, I&#8217;d give the nod to Azeri by a nose.</p>
<p><strong>Turf Male</strong> &#8211; <strong>High Chaparral</strong> by a small margin for his 2002 campaign in which he went 5-for-6 with 4 Grade 1 wins including the Epsom Derby, Irish Derby and an easy win in the Breeders&#8217; Cup Turf.   Close runner-up is Fantastic Light for his 2001 campaign where he went 4-for-6 with 4 Grade 1&#8242;s and was ultra impressive winning the Breeders&#8217; Cup Turf running a 117 Beyer (vs 111 for High Chaparral).</p>
<p><strong>Turf Female</strong> &#8211; <strong>Ouija Board</strong> (2004) where she was 4-for-5 including wins in the English Oaks, Irish Oaks, and an easy win in the BC Filly &amp; Mare Turf.  Her only loss was a 3rd to Bago in the Arc.</p>
<p>On a sidenote, Ouija Board is a horse that I think has been overrated a bit.  People consider her among the best turf females of all-time but her record against males was actually pretty weak.  Ouija Board was actually just 2-for-11 in Grade 1 races against males over the course of her career &#8211; with one of those wins coming in Hong Kong.</p>
<p><strong>Sprinter</strong> &#8211; Tough call between <strong>Kona Gold</strong> (2000) and Orientate (2002).  Kona Gold in 2000 was 5-for-6 with his only loss coming by a nose.  His Beyers that year were 112-109-119-118-117-114.   Orientate was 6-for-10 in 2002, however his 4 losses were either on turf (2) or going long (2).  Sprinting he was 6-for-6 with Beyers of 109-115-115-112-116-114.   This is a toss-up for me but since it&#8217;s impossible not to love a horse like Kona Gold who was very good for a long time, and since he was slightly faster, we&#8217;ll give him the nod.</p>
<p>Agree?  Disagree?  Let&#8217;s hear your thoughts&#8230;</p>
<p>Happy Holidays to all &#8211; and as Harvey Pack would say &#8220;May the horse be with you!&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/12/horses-of-the-decade-2000-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breeders&#8217; Cup Implications on the Eclipse Awards</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-implications-on-the-eclipse-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-implications-on-the-eclipse-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conduit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing In Silks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabulous Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldikova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Dixie Chick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shirreffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Sheppard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodiak Kowboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Is Sweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lookin At Lucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macho Again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[She Be Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vale of York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ventura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vosburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Breeders' Cup went a long way toward deciding some year-end championships, while throwing other Eclipse Award races into complete disarray.  Some quick thoughts on each category:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Breeders&#8217; Cup went a long way toward deciding some year-end championships, while throwing other <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Eclipse Award</a> races into complete disarray.  Some quick thoughts on each category:</p>
<p><strong>2 Year Old Colt</strong> &#8211; I don&#8217;t sense any groundswell of support for Vale of York getting it off a victory at 30-1 and Lookin At Lucky lost little in defeat after just missing while breaking from Post 13.  With 4 wins and a second in 5 starts including wins in the Del Mar Futurity &amp; Norfolk, Lookin At Lucky appears in the driver&#8217;s seat.</p>
<p><strong>2 Year Old Filly</strong> &#8211; Hot Dixie Chick was clearly the standout in the division but she called it a season before they even moved back to Belmont and never even went a mile.  BC winner She Be Wild generates little excitement, but her BC win coupled with a runner-up finish in the G1 Alcibiades and a solid record overall should be enough to earn the crown in a year with no standouts in the route races.</p>
<p><strong>3 Year Old Colt</strong> &#8211; Summer Bird.  Easy.</p>
<p><strong>3 Year Old Filly</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Rachel Alexandra</a>.  Easiest vote ever.  If anyone else gets a first place vote, the voter should not only lose their right to vote in the future but also have their name, email address, and Facebook profile link revealed for public humiliation.</p>
<p><strong>Older Horse</strong> &#8211; Pass please.   This is really a tough one.  At first glance Gio Ponti seems like the obvious answer by default, however I do have a bit of a problem giving an Older Horse Eclipse Award to a horse who never raced on dirt and was only 1-for-3 on fake-dirt (synthetics).  Gio Ponti&#8217;s success came primarily on turf&#8230;and that&#8217;s why they have a Grass championship category.   But if not him, who?  Einstein ran horribly in the BC and Macho Again didn&#8217;t even run at all (although I don&#8217;t think I could justify seeing him win an Eclipse under any circumstances).  If you have to give an award in this category to a grass horse, isn&#8217;t that reason enough for not distributing the award at all?  I guess they can&#8217;t collude and persuade every single voter to abstain so it has to be Gio Ponti<em> truly by default</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Older Filly &amp; Mare</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Zenyatta</a>.  No witty comment here, sorry.  She&#8217;s clearly without equal.</p>
<p><strong>Turf Male</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure that Gio Ponti would have beaten Conduit even though Conduit didn&#8217;t seem to run nearly as well this year compared to last year in winning the BC Turf &#8211; and clearly<a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/whats-left-to-prove-after-you-almost-beat-interpretation/" target="_blank"> Gio Ponti running in the Classic was strictly a risk/reward proposition as I discussed previously</a> &#8211; however his 4 Grade 1 wins on grass still entitle him to the award.  Nevertheless it definitely would have made things a little interesting if he had run in this race and lost &#8211; especially as a follow-up to getting beat by the great Interpretation in the Turf Classic at <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Belmont</a>.   Too bad Precious Passion didn&#8217;t get good a little sooner as he&#8217;s a tough horse not to like.</p>
<p><strong>Turf Female </strong>- No American standout so I think this is where Goldikova gets a lifetime achievement award for her back-to-back wins in the BC Turf Mile.  She&#8217;s a well-liked horse so I think she&#8217;ll win pretty easily in the absence of any other standouts. and a pretty disappointing year from defending champ Forever Together.</p>
<p><strong>Sprinter</strong> &#8211; Ummm yeah.  I&#8217;m gonna need you to go ahead and not give out this award this year.  Thaaaaanks!  Breeders&#8217; Cup Sprint winner Dancing In Silks was 4-for-5 however he never even ran in a graded stakes race prior to the BC.  Not nearly enough.  Zensational will get some support with his 5-for-7 record including 3 Grade 1&#8242;s, but he beat really crappy competition in those wins, benefited from soft trips each time, and ran exclusively over synthetics.  I think he had something to prove in the Breeders&#8217; Cup and I can&#8217;t see rewarding him for completely failing to meet that challenge.  That brings us to the dirt horses.  Fabulous Strike is a tough horse not to like and will get a little support but I think he lost a step this year.  2-for-5 with no Grade 1 wins ain&#8217;t going to get it done.   Finally, Kodiak Kowboy presently has a fairly unimpressive 3-for-7 record however he did win 2 major Grade 1&#8242;s (The Carter &amp; The Vosburgh) while finishing a close 2nd in another (The Forego).  He also beat Fabulous Strike in both of those Grade 1 wins &#8211; which is a lot more than you can say about the competition that Zensational was facing.  Again, I&#8217;d be in favor of not giving out the award here but since they probably have to my vote would go to Kodiak Kowboy by virtue of having the most going for him on the positive side as a result of his performances in the Carter, Forego, &amp; Vosburgh.</p>
<p><strong>Female Sprinter </strong>- Obviously Informed Decision after going 6-for-7 this year including her win in the BC F&amp;M Sprint.  Ventura was clearly best in that race as Informed Decision got the best of the pace scenario, but she&#8217;s the one with the win on her resume and an otherwise strong record so she gets the award.  Ever think you&#8217;d be hearing the words &#8220;Sprint Champion&#8221; and &#8220;Jonathan Sheppard&#8221; in the same sentence?  Me neither!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m less interested in the human awards so I&#8217;ll skip those for now (other than to say that John Shirreffs definitely deserves the trainer title for getting both Zenyatta &amp; Life Is Sweet to step it up and turn in career best efforts on their biggest days)  and I couldn&#8217;t name a single steeplechase contender for a million dollars so no comment there.  As for Horse of the Year&#8230;well that will be my next post! <img src='http://farewelltokings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Hopefully Sunday if time and life permit.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-implications-on-the-eclipse-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breeders&#8217; Cup Wrap-UP</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careless Jewel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conduit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing In Silk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forever Together]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review and recap of the 2009 Breeders' Cup race results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been debating about putting up a <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> post today because there really isn&#8217;t too much left to say that hasn&#8217;t already been said in 1,000 other places by now.   Nevertheless I think I&#8217;d feel like something was missing if I didn&#8217;t say a few words at least:</p>
<ul>
<li>Santa Anita &#8211; Wow!  For those of you who go there routinely I guess this goes without saying, but WOW (did I say that already?!)&#8230;what a view!  Those mountains make for a breathtaking backdrop.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_226" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-226" title="Mountains" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC1-300x225.jpg" alt="Wow!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wow!</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Pro-Ride &#8211; Is there any doubt at this point that this is a completely separate surface that bears no resemblance to dirt, plays more like turf, and is extremely difficult to navigate for dirt horses with no past turf or synthetic experience?  When you see consistent horses with strong dirt form completely fail to fire time after time that&#8217;s telling you something.  You know the facts by now &#8211; not a single dirt horse won or even ran well.  Consistent dirt horses like Music Note, Sara Louise, Summer Bird, D&#8217;Funnybone, Devil May Care etc etc all failed to display anywhere near their established form over this track.  Bottom line &#8211; these races mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things when it comes to dirt horses.  For all intents and purposes you need to treat them the same way you&#8217;d treat a grass race for these horses.  America is built around dirt racing so it&#8217;s just sad to see us run prominent and championship races on an entirely different surface that holds no historical value or relative significance.  In addition, you can now view some of the performances from last year (ie &#8211; Curlin) through an even more colored lense and realize those races are dead throwouts.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_225" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-225" title="Pro-Ride" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC2-300x225.jpg" alt="What is this stuff?" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">What is this stuff?</p></div>
<div id="attachment_228" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCpr.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-228" title="BCpr" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCpr-300x225.jpg" alt="This really isn't my living room carpet!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This really isn&#39;t my living room carpet!</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Marathon &#8211; If not for the fact that some of these horses were coming from Europe you&#8217;d otherwise be hard-pressed to distinguish this race from the Gallant Fox Handicap in December at Aqueduct.  Just silly.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Filllies Turf &#8211; Why?  Surprised no one closed into pretty fast fractions.  Nice effort by Rose Catherine stretching out off that sensational debut in a turf sprint at Belmont.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Fillies &#8211; Zzzzzzz.  Lots of horses in the picture.  No one all that impressive.  Not sure this race means much in the grand scheme of things except to the winners.  Tough trip for Biofuel (who I bet of course) going 100 wide and getting sideswiped as she was making her move&#8230;and still closing well for 4th.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>F&amp;M Turf &#8211; Midday figured better than these if Forever Together didn&#8217;t return to peak form.  Forever Together didn&#8217;t and Midday was.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>F&amp;M Sprint &#8211; Some people must be looking at an $8.80 payoff for 7-for-7 on synthetics Informed Decision and thinking &#8220;Wow&#8230;what an easy game&#8221; but this race was as much about pace as anything else.  The race was essentially over after the first quarter as  Informed Decision sat just off a slow 23:1 quarter while probably-best Ventura attempted to close from the back of the pack.  Sara Louise had nothing on the pro-ride.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_227" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCid.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-227" title="Informed Decision" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCid-300x225.jpg" alt="Informed Decision" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Informed Decision</p></div>
<ul>
<li>DISTAFF(!) &#8211; Not sure if Careless Jewel was just entirely rank or another with non Pro-Ride/Keeneland type synthetic experience (Woodbine is a bit of a different surface than those) who also didn&#8217;t handle the surface.  Either way, the Rachel Alexandra comparisons should stop for a while.  She should still make for a nice 4 yo if they stick to the dirt.  Obviously this was one that fell apart from the fast pace as Life Is Sweet came from the back to blow by the field.  Seeing a potent finisher like Music Note lack a strong closing punch again validates the stark  contrast in the surface.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Turf &#8211; Whatever.  Congrats to the connections I guess.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf Sprint &#8211; Was hoping for chaos again but California Flag looked best if he could avoid an early duel.  Able to get away with a slow 21:2 quarter (well slow compared to last year&#8217;s 20:3 duel) he cruised home.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Sprint &#8211; Just bet the fastest last race Beyer.  Easy game, right?!  Zensational got off a bit slow and couldn&#8217;t make the lead and showed little thereafter so obviously they decided to rest on their laurels and retire him.  After all what&#8217;s left to prove after you decisively beat Talking to MomRoo?  Fatal Bullet threw in his first synthetic clunker after everything seemed to set up well for him.  Champion Sprinter for $100, Alex?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile &#8211; I&#8217;ll leave out the fact that I was alive with 7 of these in the Pick-4 (including Piscitelli for 90k who led through slow fractions and then re-rallied in midstretch) and missed it when I picked the wrong Euros to be my &#8220;A&#8217;s&#8221; (the Sprint eliminated my B&#8217;s in this race &#8211; which Vale of York was) and just say that obviously Lookin At Lucky lost nothing in defeat here.  I&#8217;m sure this race has some Santa Anita Derby or San Felipe  implications or something&#8230;but not much else.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf Mile &#8211; Another pretty impressive performance by Goldikova who was obviously back on her &#8220;A&#8221; game.  Clearly one of the all-time good turf fillies, however I still wouldn&#8217;t put her near Miesque who ran faster, had a better career overall, and beat significantly better fields in her back-to-back triumphs.    Check out the fact that Miesque ran exclusively against males in the final EIGHT starts of her career &#8211; compiling a record of 6 wins and 2 seconds against a very deep and talented group (both in Europe &amp; the US).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Dirt Mile &#8211; Wide open race if Mastercraftsman didn&#8217;t fire.  Furthest Land obviously ran back to his last race.  Ridiculous to run this race in the heart of the Saturday card.  In other news, the &#8220;Dirt Mile&#8221; remains on target to actually be run at 1 Mile on the dirt for the first time next year.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf &#8211; Pretty uninteresting race.  Amazing they can only get 7 horses (and just 3 from the US) to run for 3 Million Dollars on the grass.  Conduit wasn&#8217;t nearly as good this year as he was last year but it was still enough to get the job done.  Precious Passion is definitely a cool horse who has obviously improved quite a bit and become way more consistent.  It&#8217;s rare to see a horse do what he does on the turf so he&#8217;s definitely fun to watch.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_229" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC4.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-229" title="BC4" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC4-300x225.jpg" alt="The Classic!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Classic!</p></div>
<div id="attachment_230" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC5.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-230" title="Zenyatta" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC5-300x225.jpg" alt="Zenyatta" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zenyatta</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Classic &#8211; Well <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Zenyatta</a> certainly surprised me.  I didn&#8217;t expect her to win going in and she certainly looked beaten throughout most of the race but she managed to blow by the field and make history.  The moment gave you goosebumps and the cheering from the crowd reminded me of a playoff game atmosphere after a game-typing basket or Home Run which is remarkable to see at a racetrack.  Nevertheless my analytical side can&#8217;t help but view this effort in a slightly different context.  At the end of the day Zenyatta beat a field of primarily turf horses on a surface that almost none of them had run their best efforts over (Gio Ponti&#8217;s best efforts are on grass, Twice Over&#8217;s also on grass, &amp; Summer Bird&#8217;s on dirt).  If Summer Bird faced Gio Ponti and Twice Over going 10 furlongs on the dirt, would you still bet him to run last of the 3?  Clearly Zenyatta is the queen of synthetics but I just can&#8217;t treat that the same way that I&#8217;d treat a horse who accomplished the same thing on dirt.  It&#8217;s a niche surface and it&#8217;s less significant than dirt.  Zenyatta very well might be as good on dirt but unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t look like we&#8217;ll ever get the chance to find out.</li>
</ul>
<p>I obviously have a lot more to say about Zenyatta and the Classic and I plan to cover Zenyatta and why <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Rachel Alexandra</a> is still <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Horse of the Year</a> in separate posts.  I&#8217;ll also give some thoughts on the <a href="../" target="_blank">2009 Eclipse Award</a> picture later in the week as well.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30,000 Foot Look at the Breeders&#8217; Cup</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upcoming Races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyer Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pure Clan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My view on the Breeders' Cup races from 30,000 feet.  From the value in Pick 4's to why Zenyatta is a horrible favorite for the Breeders Cup Classic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Literally.  On my way to California &#8211; gotta love in-flight Wifi.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written extensively about the Breeders&#8217; Cup as it pertains to <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/a-look-at-the-2009-horse-of-the-year-picture/" target="_blank">Horse of the Year</a>, <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/historical-breeders-cup-beyers/" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup Beyer Speed Figures</a> and  <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/" target="_blank">Fixing the Breeders&#8217; Cup</a>, but I&#8217;ve purposely been rather silent about this year&#8217;s <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> from a handicapping point of view because my only real opinion is that most of these races are incredibly wide-open and most favorites and short-priced horses are quite vulnerable.  The synthetic aspect really complicates things from a handicapping perspective, but it makes them awfully appealing from a betting perspective.</p>
<p>How will the dirt horses do 1st time on synthetic?  How will the turf horses do making their debuts on pro-ride&#8230;will their form carry over?  Are speed figures really less relevant on synthetics to the extent that a slower horse with a strong finishing kick can beat a faster horse?  Interesting questions and they all present opportunities for value.  Should these races be chalky I don&#8217;t envision myself having a very good weekend.</p>
<p>Here are some very quick thoughts:</p>
<p><strong>Marathon:</strong> What a ridiculous race.  Calling this a Breeders&#8217; Cup race dilutes the name.  With that said, I&#8217;d probably key around Father Time, Mastery, Man of Iron &amp; Gangbuster while covering Muhnnak, Nite Light, Cloudy&#8217;s Knight, &amp; Eldaffer to a smaller degree.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Turf Fillies </strong>- I&#8217;ll be hoping for a bomb here as I could make a case for 12 of the 14, however House of Grace is the one I probably prefer most.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Fillies</strong> &#8211; Looks wide open to me and again I&#8217;m spreading and hoping to catch a big price.  Blind Luck, Beautician, Connie &amp; Mike, She Be Wild, Negligee, Always a Princess, and maybe Biofuel.  I&#8217;ll use Connie and Michael the heaviest from a defensive perspective as she seems the most talented.</p>
<p><strong>F&amp;M Turf</strong> &#8211; Forever Together still intrigues me and 10 furlongs and a firm turf could offer her the right conditions to fire again.  Otherwise most of the rest look pretty close aside from Midday who might be better than these.  Not a lot of pace so I&#8217;m curious to see if someone tries to steal it.  Maram is another who intrigues me.  She&#8217;s slower than several strong closers like Pure Clan &amp; Magical Fantasy but she&#8217;s a rare one who seems like she&#8217;ll be more effective with added distance and would have a more potent kick going longer.  Not a throwout at all.</p>
<p><strong>F&amp;M Sprint</strong> &#8211; Ventura is probably better than these.  Curious to see how Sara Louise handles pro-ride bc she&#8217;s as good as any if she does and obviously Informed Decision is at her best going 7F on synthetics.</p>
<p><strong>Ladies Classic</strong> &#8211; D-I-S-T-A-F-F!  I actually think this race is pretty wide open.  I&#8217;m not in love with Careless Jewel who has been meeting very soft fields and doesn&#8217;t have pro-ride/Keeneland type of experience.  Music Note ran a 98 Beyer on pro-ride last year and is clearly faster this year, however I don&#8217;t love the fact that her closing kick seemed less potent on pro-ride for some reason.  Torn on her.  Mushka, Proviso, Life Is Sweet &amp; Rainbow View are also usable.  Yes that&#8217;s almost everyone but that&#8217;s what A-B-C tickets are for.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Turf</strong> &#8211; Viscount Nelson, Codoy, Pounced, Gallant Gent, King Ledley, Becky&#8217;s Kitten, Interactif, Buzzword, Bridgetown, Awesome Act.  Bomb please!</p>
<p><strong>Turf Sprint</strong> &#8211; I loved this race last year by settling on Storm Treasure to close into what I knew would be an insane pace and used him in the money in triples and caught a bomb winning with Desert Code.  There doesn&#8217;t appear to be quite as much speed this year but with so much potential for chaos in a race like this I can&#8217;t play California Flag.  If he doesn;t run his best and Diamondrella doesnt get an insane pace to run into, hopefully something wacky can happen again.</p>
<p><strong>Sprint</strong> &#8211; I kinda like Fatal Bullet.  Obviously he&#8217;s a different horse on synthetics and I think he can sit just off Zensational and run at him in the stretch.  I&#8217;d love to play heavily against Zensational who has benefited from soft trips/pace scenarios without running especially fast, but it&#8217;s a pretty weak field and other than Fatal Bullet there&#8217;s not a ton of speed to run with him and he&#8217;s clearly better capable of firing a big fig at 6F than 7F.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile</strong> &#8211; If Looking At Lucky wins, I lose.  He&#8217;s a nice horse and it wouldn&#8217;t stun me if he wins but from a value perspective he&#8217;s a horrible play.  There are a number of others who are as fast, faster, or moving forward and intriguing.  Noble&#8217;s Promise (might not love this distance &#8211; by Cuvee &#8211; even though he ran a figure good enough to win at same distance last out), D&#8217;Funnybone (if he handles pro-ride), Pulsion (moving forward and by Include which indicates he should continue to develop with time and distance), Eskendereya (don&#8217;t love Pletcher on pro-ride but this one is fast and ran well on turf already), Aikenite (big fig at Keeneland on synths and moving forward), + you have Euros with turf form.</p>
<p><strong>Mile</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ll use but try to beat Goldiskova who has been in and out this year and was more visually impressive than fast in winning last year (albeit with a pretty powerful closing kick).  I could name a ton of horses I&#8217;ll be using here but suffice to say I&#8217;ll be going pretty deep and spreading and hoping for a price.</p>
<p><strong>Dirt Mile</strong> &#8211; Pretty funny that in 3 years the &#8220;Dirt Mile&#8221; has never actually been run at a mile on the dirt.  Speaks volumes about the current absurdity that is the Breeders&#8217; Cup.  You have to like Mastercraftsman.  Beyond that it looks pretty wide open to me.</p>
<p><strong>Turf</strong> &#8211; No genius ideas here&#8230;I think Conduit is a pretty strong candidate to repeat.   Beyond that I can really only make a case for Dar Re Mi, Spanish Moon &amp; Precious Passion.</p>
<p><strong>Classic</strong> &#8211; Pretend you had been out of racing for 2 years and you called me up and said &#8220;I see it&#8217;s Breeders&#8217; Cup day&#8230;tell me about the favorite for the Classic?&#8221;  And I replied &#8220;Well&#8230;it&#8217;s a mare who is coming off Beyers of 97 and 99 in her last 2 races, beat the longest priced horse in the morning line for the Distaff by a length in her last race and beat an allowance type horse by a head in her race before that &#8211; AND has never been 1 1/4 miles before and has only run 1 1/8 once this year in June.  Does that sound like enough of  a story to bring you back into action?</p>
<p>Look, Zenyatta is wonderfully talented horse and the source of one of the most complex evaluations of a &#8220;great&#8221; in history &#8211; but she is HORRIBLE value in this race.  This race should serve as a fascinating test for the question of how relevant are speed figures/performance figures on pro-ride and is this a rare example of a horse who literally does just what it takes to win?  If you take 2-1 or less to find out then you&#8217;re betting with your heart and not your head.  From a value perspective, there&#8217;s tons here.  I think Richard&#8217;s Kid looks like a great play to at least hit the board (which in and of itself speaks to the absurdity of this Breeders&#8217; Cup) and perhaps create some big triples if Zenyatta&#8217;s out of the money.  I also like Colonel John, Einstein, &amp; the Euros (who will probably win but won&#8217;t offer nearly as much value this time around).  Not sure what to do with Gio Ponti who wasn&#8217;t very fast on pro-ride in the winter but seems to have improved since then.  Also fascinating to see what happens with Quality Road &amp; Summer Bird who are both immensely talented and pretty consistent dirt horses.  On dirt they would clearly be the 2 favorites.  Should neither run well it will make for a pretty glaring example of the differences between dirt form and pro-ride form &#8211; particularly in the case of horses without previous experience on the surface or on grass.</p>
<p>I wrote more than I though there but there&#8217;s plenty of time to kill on this 5 1/2 hour flight &#8211; and anything to distract me from these wildly uncomfortable seats on American Airlines.</p>
<p>My plan is to focus on Pick 4&#8242;s and spread pretty deeply using the standard A-B-C-X ticket style and swing for the fences.  I love these types of days because with the big fields and public money, a bomb or two and favorites losing can produce 50k-100k pick-4 payoffs.  Obviously you need to make fairly large investments, but the potential rewards are enormous on Breeders&#8217; Cup day for those with a big enough bankroll &#8211; and this year even more than normal because of all the uncertainties associated with running on pro-ride.  As a fan, I detest it.  As a bettor, I like it!</p>
<p>Good luck to all and may the horse be with you!</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Just How Fast Was Sea The Stars?</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/just-how-fast-was-sea-the-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/just-how-fast-was-sea-the-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arc de Triomphe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea The Stars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sea The Stars was running figures on the sheets that put him in company with, but certainly no better than, recent turf champions and Breeders' Cup winners.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written quite a bit about <strong><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/sea-the-stars-some-passing-thoughts/" target="_blank">Sea The Stars</a></strong> recently, so hopefully you can tolerate one last post on&#8230;<a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/sea-some-perspective/" target="_blank">Sea The Stars</a>!   I didn&#8217;t intend to write any further about him but today Thorograph put up Sea The Stars&#8217; Thorograph sheet.  This allowed for some good comparisons between him and other recent champs as well as some good historical perspective.</p>
<p>For those who aren&#8217;t familiar with the sheets, they are &#8220;performance figures&#8221; which are essentially speed figures with adjustments for weight &amp; ground loss along with some other items.  Thorograph &amp; Ragozin are the competing brands.  Each horse has their career graphically represented on a &#8220;sheet&#8221; of paper in order to view patterns and form cycles.  They&#8217;re quite good and there&#8217;s a lot of work that goes into the numbers.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s his Thorograph sheet:</p>
<p><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Sea-The-Starts-Tgraph-sheetpic.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-151" title="Sea The Starts - Tgraph sheetpic" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Sea-The-Starts-Tgraph-sheetpic-886x1023.jpg" alt="Sea The Starts - Tgraph sheetpic" width="532" height="614" /></a></p>
<p>Sea The Stars was essentially running in the 0 to 2 range in his last several starts (the lower the number, the faster the race).</p>
<p>So how does that rank?</p>
<p>Well it&#8217;s good.  Championship quality.  But that&#8217;s about it.  Nothing different than what other elite turf horses have run recently.</p>
<p>For comparative purposes:</p>
<p>* <strong>Gio Ponti&#8217;s</strong> 3 previous #&#8217;s this year going into the Turf Classic were 0.5, -0.5, 0.25</p>
<p>* <strong>Conduit</strong> ran a 0.5 winning last year&#8217;s BC Turf</p>
<p>* <strong>Eagle Mountain</strong> ran a 0 running 2nd in last year&#8217;s turf</p>
<p>* <strong>Soldier of Fortune</strong> ran 1&#8242;s in his 3 starts in Europe last year before running a 2 in the Breeders Cup.</p>
<p>* <strong>English Channel</strong> ran a -0.25 winning the 2007 BC Turf with 2.5, 0.25, 1, 1 before that.  The previous year he ran 0, 1, 0.75, 0.75, 0.75. 0.75, 2.</p>
<p>* <strong>Dylan Thomas</strong> ran 3.25, 1, 2.25, 0, 0, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2.25 working backward in 2007.</p>
<p>* <strong>Red Rocks</strong> ran a 0 winning the 2006 Breeders Cup Turf.</p>
<p>* <strong>Shirrocco</strong> ran a -0.5 winning the 2005 Breeders&#8217; Cup Turf.</p>
<p>(<em>all figures are from <a href="http://www.thorograph.com/index.php" target="_blank">Thorograph</a></em>)</p>
<p>Interesting?  I thought so!  Greatest ever?  Nah&#8230;</p>
<p>===============================</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/just-how-fast-was-sea-the-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Saturday Recap</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/super-saturday-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/super-saturday-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beldame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belmont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabulous Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flower Bowl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jockey Club Gold Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodiak Kowboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macho Again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pure Clan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quality Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queen of Hearts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turf Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vosburgh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belmont offered 5 major Grade 1 stakes races on Saturday.  Too bad the weather was absolutely brutal and the fields disappointingly small.  You would think that with the Breeders&#8217; Cup being run on a synthetic surface some of these prestigious G1&#8242;s would have drawn bigger fields but there are simply too many big money races [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belmont offered 5 major Grade 1 stakes races on Saturday.  Too bad the weather was absolutely brutal and the fields disappointingly small.  You would think that with the Breeders&#8217; Cup being run on a synthetic surface some of these prestigious G1&#8242;s would have drawn bigger fields but there are simply too many big money races for too few good horses &#8211; but those are topics for another day.   Nevertheless, it was still pretty disappointing to see these races come up so weak from a depth perspective.</p>
<p><strong>Beldame</strong> &#8211; 6 weeks ago this race was being offered as a potential stage for a Rachel-Zenyatta meeting with the possibility of Icon Project &amp; Careless Jewel being part of the field as well.  Instead it turned into a workout for Music Note with only Unbridled Belle offering any type of G1 form in opposition.  Unbridled Belle got loose on a pretty easy lead, but Music Note was still able to pass her and win in hand, running a very legit figure.</p>
<p><em>Music Note is a horse that I feel like we never really got to see just how good she is.  She got very good very quickly last year and showed an ability to finish with extremely strong final quarters.  She wasn&#8217;t sensationally fast, but as an AP Indy she figured to keep maturing.  Plus, several of her races were little more than public workouts where she simply laid over the field and barely had to run at all.  She ran well in the BC against Zenyatta but the race is a toss for me since it was on synthetics.  Music Note didn&#8217;t return until the middle of this year &#8211; where she ran inexplicably awful.  Following another small layoff she came back to run huge &#8211; defeating Indian Blessing in the 7F Ballerina.   Should she conclude her career with yesterday&#8217;s pretty effortless win and another BC race on synthetics we will really not have had the chance to see her truly strut her stuff in a stakes race going a route on the dirt in quite a long time.   Music Note clearly has gotten faster and better at 4 &#8211; as her breeding indicated was likely &#8211; so I&#8217;m definitely disappointed to not get a real season out of her.  I think it&#8217;s possible that she may have been able to take that leap and be &#8220;special&#8221; (ie &#8211; The type of horse who can blow a good field away with a powerful closing kick and run 110-type Beyer figures) but due to a combination of circumstances and the BC&#8217;s ridiculous decision to run on synthetics, she&#8217;ll likely just go down as another in a long line of &#8220;what-ifs.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>Vosburgh</strong> &#8211; 400k for a prestigious Grade 1 sprint on dirt and just 4 horses show up?!  Hard to figure.  The Forego had a full field a few weeks ago.  You would have made 12k just for walking around the track and finishing 5th!  Talented bunch at least.  It&#8217;s hard not to love Fabulous Strike.  He&#8217;s extremely fast and he&#8217;s been on the scene for several years.  I feel like yesterday&#8217;s might be the first sign that age is catching up with him.  Watching him get a perfect trip sitting off Go Go Shoot, going by at will, and opening up a couple lengths in stretch, it was tough to imagine that Kodiak Kowboy would be able to mow him down.  The last time that happened (Carter), Fabulous Strike dueled through an insane 1/2 and had to negotiate an extra furlong.  Yesterday he looked like he&#8217;d win easily, but surprisingly Kodiak Kowboy ran him down.</p>
<p>Time to give Munnings a rest.  He looked like he might be a sensational sprinter but since his attempted stretch out in the Haskell he clearly isn&#8217;t the same animal anymore.</p>
<p><strong>Flower Bowl</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/rooting-for-queen-of-hearts/">I wrote yesterday about Queen of Hearts</a> so it was definitely exciting to see her run a good 3rd.  This was a tough race and my only thought was that Pure Clan would be around.  I didn&#8217;t like Dynaforce much who, despite loving a soft turf, doesn&#8217;t appear to be the same filly as she was last year.   In the Beverly D she got a perfect trip sitting close to a very slow pace and still didn&#8217;t run nearly as well as she had last year.  I got lucky when longshots ran 2nd and 3rd to Pure Clan to make for a nice super, but a look at the fractions over the ridiculously soft turf tells you all you need to know about this race.</p>
<p><strong>Turf Classic</strong> &#8211; My friend asked if there was any shot that the favorites could be beaten in this race.  I replied &#8220;the only real chance is if Musketier steals the race on the front end since there isn&#8217;t much speed and his best races aren&#8217;t too far off Gio Ponti&#8217;s.&#8221;  So what happens?  Interpretation, who has never sniffed the lead (and rarely the winner&#8217;s circle for that matter) in his long career, goes to lead and has enough left to put away Gio Ponti in the stretch.  I didn&#8217;t play Musketier strongly, but this is why racing is maddening sometimes.  The trip that Interpretation got was exactly what Musketier should have been doing.  I can only theorize that his connections decided to take back because he faded so badly last time &#8211; but that&#8217;s because he dueled through insane fractions in the Sword Dancer.  His prior 2 efforts on the lead both produced solid efforts (100-102 Beyers and a G3 win and a second to Gio Ponti).  For them to sit lengths off a confirmed closer in Interpretation in a race where the early leader essentially goes wire to wire is simply poor strategy.  As for Gio Ponti, there were questions about his ability to get 12 furlongs going in.  Hard to put too much stock in a race like this given the conditions, but the fact that he went by Interpretation and couldn&#8217;t put him away is definitely a black mark against him regardless of circumstances.</p>
<p><em>Some interesting stats on the great Interpretation (who I actually like since I&#8217;ve used him successfully many times in the 2nd and 3rd slots). </em></p>
<ul>
<li><em>Off the board in all 6 prior starts this year<br />
</em></li>
<li><em>His last win came on Sept 15, 2007 at Philadelphia Park &#8211; with 17 straight losses in between</em></li>
<li><em>That race snapped a 1-year and 10-race losing streak as well</em></li>
<li><em>Couldn&#8217;t finish in the top half of a 6-horse field at Philadelphia Park last time out</em></li>
</ul>
<p><em>I think it&#8217;s safe to say that Gio Ponti&#8217;s longshot Horse of the Year chances just evaporated!</em></p>
<p><strong>Jockey Club Gold Cup</strong> &#8211; Summer Bird is developing into a very nice horse.  Nice to see Quality Road return to his spring form.   It&#8217;s too bad he was rushed into the Travers without proper foundation.  It would have been very interesting to see how good he would have gotten if he had progressed normally rather than going straight from 6.5F to 10F.  At this point it will take a <a href="http://farewelltokings.com">2009 Breeders&#8217; Cup Classic</a> win by Mine That Bird to deny Summer Bird the 3 yo title.  Given what has been said about Summer Bird&#8217;s poor training over synthetics in the spring, I&#8217;d pass the BC Classic with him and just prepare him for an early start to his 4 yo campaign.  He&#8217;ll win the title anyway unless Mine That Bird sometime pulls off a Classic win &#8211; and right now his stock is as high as ever.  Why risk it on a surface he purportedly doesn&#8217;t like?</p>
<p>I &#8216;d love to see Quality Road come back in the Cigar Mile and then have a proper 4 year old season where he&#8217;s not playing catch-up.</p>
<p>Macho Again reverted to previous form without an advantageous pace setup like he received in his prior 2 starts.</p>
<p><strong>Follow me on Twitter</strong>: <a href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p>
<strong>Become a Facebook Fan</strong>: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/super-saturday-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
