<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Breeders&#8217; Cup Ladies Classic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farewelltokings.com/tag/breeders-cup-ladies-classic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farewelltokings.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 14:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breeders&#8217; Cup Implications on the Eclipse Awards</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-implications-on-the-eclipse-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-implications-on-the-eclipse-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conduit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing In Silks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fabulous Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldikova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hot Dixie Chick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Informed Decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Shirreffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Sheppard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kodiak Kowboy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Is Sweet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lookin At Lucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macho Again]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[She Be Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vale of York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ventura]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vosburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Breeders' Cup went a long way toward deciding some year-end championships, while throwing other Eclipse Award races into complete disarray.  Some quick thoughts on each category:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Breeders&#8217; Cup went a long way toward deciding some year-end championships, while throwing other <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Eclipse Award</a> races into complete disarray.  Some quick thoughts on each category:</p>
<p><strong>2 Year Old Colt</strong> &#8211; I don&#8217;t sense any groundswell of support for Vale of York getting it off a victory at 30-1 and Lookin At Lucky lost little in defeat after just missing while breaking from Post 13.  With 4 wins and a second in 5 starts including wins in the Del Mar Futurity &amp; Norfolk, Lookin At Lucky appears in the driver&#8217;s seat.</p>
<p><strong>2 Year Old Filly</strong> &#8211; Hot Dixie Chick was clearly the standout in the division but she called it a season before they even moved back to Belmont and never even went a mile.  BC winner She Be Wild generates little excitement, but her BC win coupled with a runner-up finish in the G1 Alcibiades and a solid record overall should be enough to earn the crown in a year with no standouts in the route races.</p>
<p><strong>3 Year Old Colt</strong> &#8211; Summer Bird.  Easy.</p>
<p><strong>3 Year Old Filly</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Rachel Alexandra</a>.  Easiest vote ever.  If anyone else gets a first place vote, the voter should not only lose their right to vote in the future but also have their name, email address, and Facebook profile link revealed for public humiliation.</p>
<p><strong>Older Horse</strong> &#8211; Pass please.   This is really a tough one.  At first glance Gio Ponti seems like the obvious answer by default, however I do have a bit of a problem giving an Older Horse Eclipse Award to a horse who never raced on dirt and was only 1-for-3 on fake-dirt (synthetics).  Gio Ponti&#8217;s success came primarily on turf&#8230;and that&#8217;s why they have a Grass championship category.   But if not him, who?  Einstein ran horribly in the BC and Macho Again didn&#8217;t even run at all (although I don&#8217;t think I could justify seeing him win an Eclipse under any circumstances).  If you have to give an award in this category to a grass horse, isn&#8217;t that reason enough for not distributing the award at all?  I guess they can&#8217;t collude and persuade every single voter to abstain so it has to be Gio Ponti<em> truly by default</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Older Filly &amp; Mare</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Zenyatta</a>.  No witty comment here, sorry.  She&#8217;s clearly without equal.</p>
<p><strong>Turf Male</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;m not sure that Gio Ponti would have beaten Conduit even though Conduit didn&#8217;t seem to run nearly as well this year compared to last year in winning the BC Turf &#8211; and clearly<a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/whats-left-to-prove-after-you-almost-beat-interpretation/" target="_blank"> Gio Ponti running in the Classic was strictly a risk/reward proposition as I discussed previously</a> &#8211; however his 4 Grade 1 wins on grass still entitle him to the award.  Nevertheless it definitely would have made things a little interesting if he had run in this race and lost &#8211; especially as a follow-up to getting beat by the great Interpretation in the Turf Classic at <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Belmont</a>.   Too bad Precious Passion didn&#8217;t get good a little sooner as he&#8217;s a tough horse not to like.</p>
<p><strong>Turf Female </strong>- No American standout so I think this is where Goldikova gets a lifetime achievement award for her back-to-back wins in the BC Turf Mile.  She&#8217;s a well-liked horse so I think she&#8217;ll win pretty easily in the absence of any other standouts. and a pretty disappointing year from defending champ Forever Together.</p>
<p><strong>Sprinter</strong> &#8211; Ummm yeah.  I&#8217;m gonna need you to go ahead and not give out this award this year.  Thaaaaanks!  Breeders&#8217; Cup Sprint winner Dancing In Silks was 4-for-5 however he never even ran in a graded stakes race prior to the BC.  Not nearly enough.  Zensational will get some support with his 5-for-7 record including 3 Grade 1&#8242;s, but he beat really crappy competition in those wins, benefited from soft trips each time, and ran exclusively over synthetics.  I think he had something to prove in the Breeders&#8217; Cup and I can&#8217;t see rewarding him for completely failing to meet that challenge.  That brings us to the dirt horses.  Fabulous Strike is a tough horse not to like and will get a little support but I think he lost a step this year.  2-for-5 with no Grade 1 wins ain&#8217;t going to get it done.   Finally, Kodiak Kowboy presently has a fairly unimpressive 3-for-7 record however he did win 2 major Grade 1&#8242;s (The Carter &amp; The Vosburgh) while finishing a close 2nd in another (The Forego).  He also beat Fabulous Strike in both of those Grade 1 wins &#8211; which is a lot more than you can say about the competition that Zensational was facing.  Again, I&#8217;d be in favor of not giving out the award here but since they probably have to my vote would go to Kodiak Kowboy by virtue of having the most going for him on the positive side as a result of his performances in the Carter, Forego, &amp; Vosburgh.</p>
<p><strong>Female Sprinter </strong>- Obviously Informed Decision after going 6-for-7 this year including her win in the BC F&amp;M Sprint.  Ventura was clearly best in that race as Informed Decision got the best of the pace scenario, but she&#8217;s the one with the win on her resume and an otherwise strong record so she gets the award.  Ever think you&#8217;d be hearing the words &#8220;Sprint Champion&#8221; and &#8220;Jonathan Sheppard&#8221; in the same sentence?  Me neither!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m less interested in the human awards so I&#8217;ll skip those for now (other than to say that John Shirreffs definitely deserves the trainer title for getting both Zenyatta &amp; Life Is Sweet to step it up and turn in career best efforts on their biggest days)  and I couldn&#8217;t name a single steeplechase contender for a million dollars so no comment there.  As for Horse of the Year&#8230;well that will be my next post! <img src='http://farewelltokings.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Hopefully Sunday if time and life permit.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-implications-on-the-eclipse-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breeders&#8217; Cup Wrap-UP</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Careless Jewel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conduit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dancing In Silk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forever Together]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precious Passion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Review and recap of the 2009 Breeders' Cup race results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been debating about putting up a <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> post today because there really isn&#8217;t too much left to say that hasn&#8217;t already been said in 1,000 other places by now.   Nevertheless I think I&#8217;d feel like something was missing if I didn&#8217;t say a few words at least:</p>
<ul>
<li>Santa Anita &#8211; Wow!  For those of you who go there routinely I guess this goes without saying, but WOW (did I say that already?!)&#8230;what a view!  Those mountains make for a breathtaking backdrop.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_226" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-226" title="Mountains" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC1-300x225.jpg" alt="Wow!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Wow!</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Pro-Ride &#8211; Is there any doubt at this point that this is a completely separate surface that bears no resemblance to dirt, plays more like turf, and is extremely difficult to navigate for dirt horses with no past turf or synthetic experience?  When you see consistent horses with strong dirt form completely fail to fire time after time that&#8217;s telling you something.  You know the facts by now &#8211; not a single dirt horse won or even ran well.  Consistent dirt horses like Music Note, Sara Louise, Summer Bird, D&#8217;Funnybone, Devil May Care etc etc all failed to display anywhere near their established form over this track.  Bottom line &#8211; these races mean absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things when it comes to dirt horses.  For all intents and purposes you need to treat them the same way you&#8217;d treat a grass race for these horses.  America is built around dirt racing so it&#8217;s just sad to see us run prominent and championship races on an entirely different surface that holds no historical value or relative significance.  In addition, you can now view some of the performances from last year (ie &#8211; Curlin) through an even more colored lense and realize those races are dead throwouts.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_225" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC2.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-225" title="Pro-Ride" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC2-300x225.jpg" alt="What is this stuff?" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">What is this stuff?</p></div>
<div id="attachment_228" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCpr.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-228" title="BCpr" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCpr-300x225.jpg" alt="This really isn't my living room carpet!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This really isn&#39;t my living room carpet!</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Marathon &#8211; If not for the fact that some of these horses were coming from Europe you&#8217;d otherwise be hard-pressed to distinguish this race from the Gallant Fox Handicap in December at Aqueduct.  Just silly.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Filllies Turf &#8211; Why?  Surprised no one closed into pretty fast fractions.  Nice effort by Rose Catherine stretching out off that sensational debut in a turf sprint at Belmont.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Fillies &#8211; Zzzzzzz.  Lots of horses in the picture.  No one all that impressive.  Not sure this race means much in the grand scheme of things except to the winners.  Tough trip for Biofuel (who I bet of course) going 100 wide and getting sideswiped as she was making her move&#8230;and still closing well for 4th.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>F&amp;M Turf &#8211; Midday figured better than these if Forever Together didn&#8217;t return to peak form.  Forever Together didn&#8217;t and Midday was.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>F&amp;M Sprint &#8211; Some people must be looking at an $8.80 payoff for 7-for-7 on synthetics Informed Decision and thinking &#8220;Wow&#8230;what an easy game&#8221; but this race was as much about pace as anything else.  The race was essentially over after the first quarter as  Informed Decision sat just off a slow 23:1 quarter while probably-best Ventura attempted to close from the back of the pack.  Sara Louise had nothing on the pro-ride.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_227" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCid.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-227" title="Informed Decision" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BCid-300x225.jpg" alt="Informed Decision" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Informed Decision</p></div>
<ul>
<li>DISTAFF(!) &#8211; Not sure if Careless Jewel was just entirely rank or another with non Pro-Ride/Keeneland type synthetic experience (Woodbine is a bit of a different surface than those) who also didn&#8217;t handle the surface.  Either way, the Rachel Alexandra comparisons should stop for a while.  She should still make for a nice 4 yo if they stick to the dirt.  Obviously this was one that fell apart from the fast pace as Life Is Sweet came from the back to blow by the field.  Seeing a potent finisher like Music Note lack a strong closing punch again validates the stark  contrast in the surface.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile Turf &#8211; Whatever.  Congrats to the connections I guess.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf Sprint &#8211; Was hoping for chaos again but California Flag looked best if he could avoid an early duel.  Able to get away with a slow 21:2 quarter (well slow compared to last year&#8217;s 20:3 duel) he cruised home.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Sprint &#8211; Just bet the fastest last race Beyer.  Easy game, right?!  Zensational got off a bit slow and couldn&#8217;t make the lead and showed little thereafter so obviously they decided to rest on their laurels and retire him.  After all what&#8217;s left to prove after you decisively beat Talking to MomRoo?  Fatal Bullet threw in his first synthetic clunker after everything seemed to set up well for him.  Champion Sprinter for $100, Alex?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Juvenile &#8211; I&#8217;ll leave out the fact that I was alive with 7 of these in the Pick-4 (including Piscitelli for 90k who led through slow fractions and then re-rallied in midstretch) and missed it when I picked the wrong Euros to be my &#8220;A&#8217;s&#8221; (the Sprint eliminated my B&#8217;s in this race &#8211; which Vale of York was) and just say that obviously Lookin At Lucky lost nothing in defeat here.  I&#8217;m sure this race has some Santa Anita Derby or San Felipe  implications or something&#8230;but not much else.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf Mile &#8211; Another pretty impressive performance by Goldikova who was obviously back on her &#8220;A&#8221; game.  Clearly one of the all-time good turf fillies, however I still wouldn&#8217;t put her near Miesque who ran faster, had a better career overall, and beat significantly better fields in her back-to-back triumphs.    Check out the fact that Miesque ran exclusively against males in the final EIGHT starts of her career &#8211; compiling a record of 6 wins and 2 seconds against a very deep and talented group (both in Europe &amp; the US).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Dirt Mile &#8211; Wide open race if Mastercraftsman didn&#8217;t fire.  Furthest Land obviously ran back to his last race.  Ridiculous to run this race in the heart of the Saturday card.  In other news, the &#8220;Dirt Mile&#8221; remains on target to actually be run at 1 Mile on the dirt for the first time next year.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Turf &#8211; Pretty uninteresting race.  Amazing they can only get 7 horses (and just 3 from the US) to run for 3 Million Dollars on the grass.  Conduit wasn&#8217;t nearly as good this year as he was last year but it was still enough to get the job done.  Precious Passion is definitely a cool horse who has obviously improved quite a bit and become way more consistent.  It&#8217;s rare to see a horse do what he does on the turf so he&#8217;s definitely fun to watch.</li>
</ul>
<div id="attachment_229" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC4.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-229" title="BC4" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC4-300x225.jpg" alt="The Classic!" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The Classic!</p></div>
<div id="attachment_230" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC5.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-230" title="Zenyatta" src="http://farewelltokings.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BC5-300x225.jpg" alt="Zenyatta" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Zenyatta</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Classic &#8211; Well <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Zenyatta</a> certainly surprised me.  I didn&#8217;t expect her to win going in and she certainly looked beaten throughout most of the race but she managed to blow by the field and make history.  The moment gave you goosebumps and the cheering from the crowd reminded me of a playoff game atmosphere after a game-typing basket or Home Run which is remarkable to see at a racetrack.  Nevertheless my analytical side can&#8217;t help but view this effort in a slightly different context.  At the end of the day Zenyatta beat a field of primarily turf horses on a surface that almost none of them had run their best efforts over (Gio Ponti&#8217;s best efforts are on grass, Twice Over&#8217;s also on grass, &amp; Summer Bird&#8217;s on dirt).  If Summer Bird faced Gio Ponti and Twice Over going 10 furlongs on the dirt, would you still bet him to run last of the 3?  Clearly Zenyatta is the queen of synthetics but I just can&#8217;t treat that the same way that I&#8217;d treat a horse who accomplished the same thing on dirt.  It&#8217;s a niche surface and it&#8217;s less significant than dirt.  Zenyatta very well might be as good on dirt but unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t look like we&#8217;ll ever get the chance to find out.</li>
</ul>
<p>I obviously have a lot more to say about Zenyatta and the Classic and I plan to cover Zenyatta and why <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Rachel Alexandra</a> is still <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Horse of the Year</a> in separate posts.  I&#8217;ll also give some thoughts on the <a href="../" target="_blank">2009 Eclipse Award</a> picture later in the week as well.</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/breeders-cup-wrap-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>30,000 Foot Look at the Breeders&#8217; Cup</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handicapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upcoming Races]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyer Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatal Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gio Ponti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music Note]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro-ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pure Clan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zensational]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My view on the Breeders' Cup races from 30,000 feet.  From the value in Pick 4's to why Zenyatta is a horrible favorite for the Breeders Cup Classic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Literally.  On my way to California &#8211; gotta love in-flight Wifi.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written extensively about the Breeders&#8217; Cup as it pertains to <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/a-look-at-the-2009-horse-of-the-year-picture/" target="_blank">Horse of the Year</a>, <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/historical-breeders-cup-beyers/" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup Beyer Speed Figures</a> and  <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/" target="_blank">Fixing the Breeders&#8217; Cup</a>, but I&#8217;ve purposely been rather silent about this year&#8217;s <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> from a handicapping point of view because my only real opinion is that most of these races are incredibly wide-open and most favorites and short-priced horses are quite vulnerable.  The synthetic aspect really complicates things from a handicapping perspective, but it makes them awfully appealing from a betting perspective.</p>
<p>How will the dirt horses do 1st time on synthetic?  How will the turf horses do making their debuts on pro-ride&#8230;will their form carry over?  Are speed figures really less relevant on synthetics to the extent that a slower horse with a strong finishing kick can beat a faster horse?  Interesting questions and they all present opportunities for value.  Should these races be chalky I don&#8217;t envision myself having a very good weekend.</p>
<p>Here are some very quick thoughts:</p>
<p><strong>Marathon:</strong> What a ridiculous race.  Calling this a Breeders&#8217; Cup race dilutes the name.  With that said, I&#8217;d probably key around Father Time, Mastery, Man of Iron &amp; Gangbuster while covering Muhnnak, Nite Light, Cloudy&#8217;s Knight, &amp; Eldaffer to a smaller degree.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Turf Fillies </strong>- I&#8217;ll be hoping for a bomb here as I could make a case for 12 of the 14, however House of Grace is the one I probably prefer most.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Fillies</strong> &#8211; Looks wide open to me and again I&#8217;m spreading and hoping to catch a big price.  Blind Luck, Beautician, Connie &amp; Mike, She Be Wild, Negligee, Always a Princess, and maybe Biofuel.  I&#8217;ll use Connie and Michael the heaviest from a defensive perspective as she seems the most talented.</p>
<p><strong>F&amp;M Turf</strong> &#8211; Forever Together still intrigues me and 10 furlongs and a firm turf could offer her the right conditions to fire again.  Otherwise most of the rest look pretty close aside from Midday who might be better than these.  Not a lot of pace so I&#8217;m curious to see if someone tries to steal it.  Maram is another who intrigues me.  She&#8217;s slower than several strong closers like Pure Clan &amp; Magical Fantasy but she&#8217;s a rare one who seems like she&#8217;ll be more effective with added distance and would have a more potent kick going longer.  Not a throwout at all.</p>
<p><strong>F&amp;M Sprint</strong> &#8211; Ventura is probably better than these.  Curious to see how Sara Louise handles pro-ride bc she&#8217;s as good as any if she does and obviously Informed Decision is at her best going 7F on synthetics.</p>
<p><strong>Ladies Classic</strong> &#8211; D-I-S-T-A-F-F!  I actually think this race is pretty wide open.  I&#8217;m not in love with Careless Jewel who has been meeting very soft fields and doesn&#8217;t have pro-ride/Keeneland type of experience.  Music Note ran a 98 Beyer on pro-ride last year and is clearly faster this year, however I don&#8217;t love the fact that her closing kick seemed less potent on pro-ride for some reason.  Torn on her.  Mushka, Proviso, Life Is Sweet &amp; Rainbow View are also usable.  Yes that&#8217;s almost everyone but that&#8217;s what A-B-C tickets are for.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile Turf</strong> &#8211; Viscount Nelson, Codoy, Pounced, Gallant Gent, King Ledley, Becky&#8217;s Kitten, Interactif, Buzzword, Bridgetown, Awesome Act.  Bomb please!</p>
<p><strong>Turf Sprint</strong> &#8211; I loved this race last year by settling on Storm Treasure to close into what I knew would be an insane pace and used him in the money in triples and caught a bomb winning with Desert Code.  There doesn&#8217;t appear to be quite as much speed this year but with so much potential for chaos in a race like this I can&#8217;t play California Flag.  If he doesn;t run his best and Diamondrella doesnt get an insane pace to run into, hopefully something wacky can happen again.</p>
<p><strong>Sprint</strong> &#8211; I kinda like Fatal Bullet.  Obviously he&#8217;s a different horse on synthetics and I think he can sit just off Zensational and run at him in the stretch.  I&#8217;d love to play heavily against Zensational who has benefited from soft trips/pace scenarios without running especially fast, but it&#8217;s a pretty weak field and other than Fatal Bullet there&#8217;s not a ton of speed to run with him and he&#8217;s clearly better capable of firing a big fig at 6F than 7F.</p>
<p><strong>Juvenile</strong> &#8211; If Looking At Lucky wins, I lose.  He&#8217;s a nice horse and it wouldn&#8217;t stun me if he wins but from a value perspective he&#8217;s a horrible play.  There are a number of others who are as fast, faster, or moving forward and intriguing.  Noble&#8217;s Promise (might not love this distance &#8211; by Cuvee &#8211; even though he ran a figure good enough to win at same distance last out), D&#8217;Funnybone (if he handles pro-ride), Pulsion (moving forward and by Include which indicates he should continue to develop with time and distance), Eskendereya (don&#8217;t love Pletcher on pro-ride but this one is fast and ran well on turf already), Aikenite (big fig at Keeneland on synths and moving forward), + you have Euros with turf form.</p>
<p><strong>Mile</strong> &#8211; I&#8217;ll use but try to beat Goldiskova who has been in and out this year and was more visually impressive than fast in winning last year (albeit with a pretty powerful closing kick).  I could name a ton of horses I&#8217;ll be using here but suffice to say I&#8217;ll be going pretty deep and spreading and hoping for a price.</p>
<p><strong>Dirt Mile</strong> &#8211; Pretty funny that in 3 years the &#8220;Dirt Mile&#8221; has never actually been run at a mile on the dirt.  Speaks volumes about the current absurdity that is the Breeders&#8217; Cup.  You have to like Mastercraftsman.  Beyond that it looks pretty wide open to me.</p>
<p><strong>Turf</strong> &#8211; No genius ideas here&#8230;I think Conduit is a pretty strong candidate to repeat.   Beyond that I can really only make a case for Dar Re Mi, Spanish Moon &amp; Precious Passion.</p>
<p><strong>Classic</strong> &#8211; Pretend you had been out of racing for 2 years and you called me up and said &#8220;I see it&#8217;s Breeders&#8217; Cup day&#8230;tell me about the favorite for the Classic?&#8221;  And I replied &#8220;Well&#8230;it&#8217;s a mare who is coming off Beyers of 97 and 99 in her last 2 races, beat the longest priced horse in the morning line for the Distaff by a length in her last race and beat an allowance type horse by a head in her race before that &#8211; AND has never been 1 1/4 miles before and has only run 1 1/8 once this year in June.  Does that sound like enough of  a story to bring you back into action?</p>
<p>Look, Zenyatta is wonderfully talented horse and the source of one of the most complex evaluations of a &#8220;great&#8221; in history &#8211; but she is HORRIBLE value in this race.  This race should serve as a fascinating test for the question of how relevant are speed figures/performance figures on pro-ride and is this a rare example of a horse who literally does just what it takes to win?  If you take 2-1 or less to find out then you&#8217;re betting with your heart and not your head.  From a value perspective, there&#8217;s tons here.  I think Richard&#8217;s Kid looks like a great play to at least hit the board (which in and of itself speaks to the absurdity of this Breeders&#8217; Cup) and perhaps create some big triples if Zenyatta&#8217;s out of the money.  I also like Colonel John, Einstein, &amp; the Euros (who will probably win but won&#8217;t offer nearly as much value this time around).  Not sure what to do with Gio Ponti who wasn&#8217;t very fast on pro-ride in the winter but seems to have improved since then.  Also fascinating to see what happens with Quality Road &amp; Summer Bird who are both immensely talented and pretty consistent dirt horses.  On dirt they would clearly be the 2 favorites.  Should neither run well it will make for a pretty glaring example of the differences between dirt form and pro-ride form &#8211; particularly in the case of horses without previous experience on the surface or on grass.</p>
<p>I wrote more than I though there but there&#8217;s plenty of time to kill on this 5 1/2 hour flight &#8211; and anything to distract me from these wildly uncomfortable seats on American Airlines.</p>
<p>My plan is to focus on Pick 4&#8242;s and spread pretty deeply using the standard A-B-C-X ticket style and swing for the fences.  I love these types of days because with the big fields and public money, a bomb or two and favorites losing can produce 50k-100k pick-4 payoffs.  Obviously you need to make fairly large investments, but the potential rewards are enormous on Breeders&#8217; Cup day for those with a big enough bankroll &#8211; and this year even more than normal because of all the uncertainties associated with running on pro-ride.  As a fan, I detest it.  As a bettor, I like it!</p>
<p>Good luck to all and may the horse be with you!</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/30000-foot-look-at-the-b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historical Breeders&#8217; Cup Beyers</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/historical-breeders-cup-beyers/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/historical-breeders-cup-beyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyer Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A list of the winning Beyer Speed Figures for virtually every Breeders' Cup race ever run since 1984.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a previous post I talked about <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/why-i-like-speed-figures/" target="_blank">Why I Like Speed Figures</a>.  There I mentioned that I had a near-complete archive of <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Beyer Speed Figures</a> for all <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup races</a> to date that I have accumulated over the years.  The DRF&#8217;s Beyer Speed Figure database generally goes back to 1992 but they were published before then in The Racing Times and Bloodstock Research before that.  As a numbers guy I&#8217;ve always found it interesting to save and review some of these historic figures.  They&#8217;re great for perspective and historical context.</p>
<p>So without further adieu here are the Beyer Speed Figures for all the &#8220;real&#8221; Breeders&#8217; Cup races going back to 1984 &#8211; with the exception of a few of the early turf races.  I&#8217;ve highlighted the fastest figures.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Classic</strong></span></p>
<p>08 – Raven’s Pass – 110<br />
07 – Curlin – 119<br />
06 &#8211; Invasor &#8211; 116<br />
05 &#8211; Saint Liam &#8211; 112<br />
04 &#8211;  <strong>Ghostzapper &#8211; 124</strong><br />
03 &#8211; Pleasantly Perfect &#8211; 119<br />
02 &#8211; Volponi &#8211; 116<br />
01 &#8211;  Tiznow &#8211; 117<br />
00 &#8211; Tiznow &#8211; 116<br />
99 &#8211; Cat Thief &#8211; 118<br />
98 &#8211; Awesome Again  &#8211; 116<br />
97 &#8211; <strong>Skip Away &#8211; 120</strong><br />
96 &#8211; Alphabet Soup &#8211; 115<br />
95 &#8211; Cigar &#8211;  117<br />
94 &#8211; Concern &#8211; 115<br />
93 &#8211; Arcangues &#8211; 114<br />
92 &#8211; A.P. Indy &#8211; 114<br />
91  &#8211; Black Tie Affair &#8211; 120<br />
90 &#8211; Unbridled &#8211; 116<br />
89 &#8211; <strong>Sunday Silence &#8211;  124</strong><br />
88 &#8211; <strong>Alysheba &#8211; 122</strong><br />
87 &#8211; Ferdinand &#8211; 117<br />
86 &#8211; Skywalker &#8211; 118<br />
85  &#8211; <strong>Proud Truth &#8211; 120</strong><br />
84 &#8211; Wild Again &#8211; 113</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Distaff</span></strong><br />
08  – Zenyatta &#8211; 103<br />
07 – Ginger Punch &#8211; 104<br />
06 &#8211; Round Pond &#8211; 100<br />
05 &#8211; Pleasant Home &#8211; 107<br />
04 &#8211; Ashado &#8211;  102<br />
03 &#8211; Adoaration &#8211; 101<br />
02 &#8211; Azeri &#8211; 111<br />
01 &#8211; Unbridled Elaine &#8211;  102<br />
00 &#8211; Spain &#8211; 108<br />
99 &#8211; Beautiful Pleasure &#8211; 109<br />
98 &#8211; Escena &#8211;  105<br />
97 &#8211; Ajina &#8211; 108<br />
96 &#8211; <strong>Jewel Princess &#8211; 114</strong><br />
95 &#8211; <strong>Inside Information  &#8211; 119</strong><br />
94 &#8211; One Dreamer &#8211; 105<br />
93 &#8211; Hollywood Wildcat &#8211; 108<br />
92 &#8211; Paseana  &#8211; 105<br />
91 &#8211; Dance Smartly &#8211; 107<br />
90 &#8211; <strong>Bayakoa &#8211; 113</strong><br />
89 &#8211; <strong>Bayakoa &#8211;  115</strong><br />
88 &#8211; <strong>Personal Ensign &#8211; 115</strong><br />
87 &#8211; Sacahuista &#8211; 106<br />
86 &#8211; <strong>Lady&#8217;s Secret  &#8211; 113</strong><br />
85 &#8211;  Life&#8217;s Magic &#8211; 110<br />
84 &#8211; <strong>Princess Rooney &#8211;  120</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Sprint</span></strong><br />
08 – Midnight Lute &#8211; 112<br />
07- Midnight Lute &#8211; 108<br />
06 &#8211; Thor&#8217;s Echo &#8211; 116<br />
05 &#8211; Silver Train &#8211; 114<br />
04 &#8211; Speightstown &#8211;  112<br />
03 &#8211; <strong>Cajun Beat &#8211; 120</strong><br />
02 &#8211; Orientate &#8211; 114<br />
01 &#8211; Squirtle Squirt &#8211;  119<br />
00 &#8211; Kona Gold &#8211; 114<br />
99 &#8211; <strong>Artax &#8211; 124</strong><br />
98 &#8211; Reraise &#8211; 112<br />
97 &#8211;  Elmhurst &#8211; 111<br />
96 &#8211; Lit de Justice &#8211; 114<br />
95 &#8211; Desert Stormer &#8211; 107<br />
94 &#8211;  Cherokee Run &#8211; 114<br />
93 &#8211; Cardmania &#8211; 109<br />
92 &#8211; Thirty Slews &#8211; 111<br />
91 &#8211;  Sheikh Albadou &#8211; 113<br />
90 &#8211; Safely Kept &#8211;  116<br />
89 &#8211; Dancing Spree &#8211; 115<br />
88 &#8211; Gulch &#8211; 116<br />
87 &#8211; <strong>Very Subtle &#8211;  121</strong><br />
86 &#8211; Smile &#8211; 118<br />
85 &#8211; <strong>Precisionist &#8211; 125</strong><br />
84 &#8211; Eillo &#8211;  108</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Juvenile</span></strong><br />
08 – Midshipman – 91<br />
07 – <strong>War Pass &#8211; 113</strong><br />
06 -<strong> Street Sense &#8211; 108</strong><br />
05 &#8211; Stevie Wonderboy &#8211; 104<br />
04 &#8211; Wilko &#8211;  98<br />
03 &#8211; Action This Day &#8211; 92<br />
02 &#8211; Vindication &#8211; 102<br />
01 &#8211; Johannesburg &#8211;  99<br />
00 &#8211; Macho Uno &#8211; 99<br />
99 &#8211; Anees &#8211; 102<br />
98 &#8211; Answer Lively &#8211; 97<br />
97 &#8211;  Favorite Trick &#8211; 101<br />
96 &#8211; Boston Harbor &#8211; 99<br />
95 &#8211; Unbridled&#8217;s Song &#8211;  103<br />
94 &#8211; Timber Country &#8211; 100<br />
93 &#8211; Brocco &#8211; 97<br />
92 &#8211; Gilded Time &#8211;  87<br />
91 &#8211; Arazi &#8211; 101<br />
90 &#8211; Fly So Free &#8211; 101<br />
89 &#8211; Rhythm &#8211; 98<br />
88 &#8211; Is  It True &#8211; 102<br />
87 &#8211; <strong>Success Express &#8211; 109</strong><br />
86 &#8211; Capote &#8211; 93<br />
85 &#8211; Tasso &#8211;  97<br />
84 -<strong> Chief&#8217;s Crown &#8211; 106</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Juvenile  Fillies</span></strong><br />
08 – Stardom Bound – 94<br />
07 – Indian Blessing &#8211; 95<br />
06 &#8211; Dreaming of Anna &#8211; 90<br />
05 &#8211; Folklore &#8211; 87<br />
04 &#8211; <strong>Sweet Catomine &#8211;  102</strong><br />
03 &#8211; Halfbridled &#8211; 99<br />
02 &#8211; <strong>Storm Flag Flying &#8211; 102</strong><br />
01 &#8211; <strong>Tempera &#8211;  107</strong><br />
00 &#8211; Caressing &#8211; 92<br />
99 &#8211; Cash Run &#8211; 93<br />
98 &#8211; <strong>Silverbulletday &#8211;  101</strong><br />
97 &#8211; Countess Diana &#8211; 95<br />
96 &#8211; Storm Song &#8211; 97<br />
95 &#8211; My Flag &#8211;  95<br />
94 &#8211; Flanders &#8211; 92<br />
93 &#8211; Phone Chatter &#8211; 95<br />
92 &#8211; Eliza &#8211; 92<br />
91 &#8211;  Pleasant Stage &#8211; 85<br />
90 &#8211; Meadow Star &#8211; 98<br />
89 &#8211; Go For Wand &#8211; 93<br />
88 &#8211;  Open Mind &#8211; 91<br />
87 &#8211; Epitome &#8211; 97<br />
86 &#8211; Brave Raj &#8211; 98<br />
85 &#8211; <strong>Twilight  Ridge &#8211; 101</strong><br />
84 &#8211; Outstandingly &#8211; 89</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Turf</span></strong><br />
08 – <strong>Conduit – 116</strong><br />
07 – English Channel &#8211; 111<br />
06 &#8211; Red Rocks &#8211; 109<br />
05 &#8211; Shirocco &#8211; 114<br />
04 &#8211; Bettar Talk Now &#8211;  111<br />
03 &#8211; High Chaparral/Johar &#8211; 112<br />
02 &#8211; High Chaparral &#8211; 111<br />
01 -<strong> Fantastic Light &#8211; 117</strong><br />
00 &#8211; Kalanisi &#8211; 110<br />
99 &#8211; <strong>Daylami &#8211; 118</strong><br />
98 &#8211;  Buck&#8217;s Boy &#8211; 111<br />
97 &#8211; Chief Bearhart &#8211; 110<br />
96 &#8211; <strong>Pilsudski &#8211; 115</strong><br />
95 &#8211;  Northern Spur &#8211; 114<br />
94 &#8211; <strong>Tikkanen &#8211; 115</strong><br />
93 &#8211; Kotashaan &#8211; 111<br />
92 &#8211;  Fraise &#8211; 110<br />
91 &#8211; Miss Alleged &#8211; 111<br />
90 &#8211; In the Wings &#8211; 113<br />
89 &#8211; Prized &#8211;  110<br />
88 &#8211; Great Communicator &#8211; 113<br />
87 &#8211; <strong>Theatrical &#8211;  115</strong><br />
86 &#8211; Manila &#8211; xx<br />
85 &#8211; Pebbles &#8211; xx<br />
84 &#8211; Lashkari  &#8211; xx</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Mile</span></strong><br />
08 – Goldikova – 107<br />
07 – Kip Deville &#8211; 108<br />
06 &#8211; Miesque&#8217;s Approval &#8211; 109<br />
05 &#8211; Artie Schiller &#8211; 110<br />
04 &#8211;  Singletary &#8211; 109<br />
03 &#8211; Six Perfections &#8211; 105<br />
02 &#8211; Domedriver &#8211; 113<br />
01 &#8211; <strong>Val Royal &#8211;  114</strong><br />
00 &#8211; War Chant &#8211; 108<br />
99 &#8211; Silic &#8211; 110<br />
98 -<strong> Da Hoss &#8211; 114</strong><br />
97 &#8211;  <strong>Spinning World &#8211; 114</strong><br />
96 &#8211; <strong>Da Hoss &#8211; 114</strong><br />
95 &#8211; <strong>Ridgewood Pearl &#8211; 114</strong><br />
94 &#8211;  Barathea &#8211; 109<br />
93 &#8211; Lure &#8211; 112<br />
92 &#8211; Lure &#8211; 112<br />
91 &#8211; Opening Verse &#8211;  110<br />
90 &#8211; Royal  Academy &#8211; 111<br />
89 &#8211;  Steinlen &#8211; 109<br />
88 &#8211; <strong>Miesque &#8211; 117</strong><br />
87 &#8211; <strong>Miesque &#8211; 119</strong><br />
86 &#8211; Last Tycoon &#8211; xx<br />
85 &#8211; Cozzen &#8211; xx<br />
84 &#8211; Royal Heroine &#8211; xx</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">F&amp;M  Turf</span></strong><br />
08 – Forever Together – 105<br />
07 – Lahudood &#8211;  105<br />
06 &#8211; Ouija Board &#8211; 108<br />
05 &#8211; Intercontinental &#8211; 107<br />
04 &#8211; Ouija Board  &#8211; 108<br />
03 &#8211; Islington &#8211; 109<br />
02 &#8211; Starine &#8211; 109<br />
01 &#8211; <strong>Banks Hill &#8211;  112</strong><br />
00 &#8211; Perfect Sting &#8211; 105<br />
99 &#8211; Soaring Softly – 105</p>
<p>Hope you enjoyed.  If anyone happens to have the early turf figures that I missed please let me know.  I know I have an old edition of The Racing Times where they included those figures but to my mother&#8217;s dismay this isn&#8217;t going to be the week that I return home and sort through all the old newspapers piled up in my old room!</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/11/historical-breeders-cup-beyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Rachel Alexandra the Best Filly Ever?</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyer Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bird Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distaff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farda Amiga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Go For Wand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady's Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lakeway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miesque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Ensign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Princess Rooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proud Spell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rags to Riches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruffian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silverbulletday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smuggler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speed Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surfside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Very Subtle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wait a While]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winning Colors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xtra Heat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How good is Rachel Alexandra?  We've heard everything from best ever to overrated.  An examination of her record and figures vs top fillies in history shows...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how good is <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank"><strong>Rachel Alexandra</strong></a>?  We&#8217;ve heard everything from &#8220;best filly  ever&#8221; to &#8220;overrated&#8221; and just about everything in between.  All of these assessments are fair based  on a cursory look at what she&#8217;s done.  On one hand, she&#8217;s done things that 3  year old fillies have never done (win a classic, beat older males in a G1, win  the Kentucky Oaks by almost 20 lengths).  On the other hand her competition has  been historically weak.  The 3 year old fillies she&#8217;s beating are so far away  from normal championship quality that you could measure the gap by eighth poles  and quarter poles rather than lengths; and Rachel was life and death to hold on  against Macho Again who wouldn&#8217;t even be Grade 1 quality in most handicap  divisions and Mine That Bird who is still one of the more fluky Kentucky Derby  winners in history.  On the flipside though, she had brutal trips in the  Preakness and Woodward and showed incredible competitive spirit and talent to  still hold on and win.  In a race like the Haskell where she didn&#8217;t  encounter arduous circumstances, she produced an exceptional performance and an  exceptional speed figure.</p>
<p>On the other hand&#8230;well there is no other hand.  That&#8217;s pretty much what  you&#8217;ve got.  Rachel Alexandra is a 3 year old filly who can run a 116 Beyer  Speed Figure against top competition in a fairly run race and a 108-11 BSF when  she encounters difficult trip and pace scenarios.</p>
<p>So where does that leave us?  In my <a href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/why-i-like-speed-figures/" target="_blank">last post</a> I talked about how I loved speed figures because they provide us with some means of comparing horses in a historical sense.  Here are Rachel Alexandra&#8217;s last several Beyers:</p>
<p>Woodward &#8211; 109<br />
Haskell &#8211; 116<br />
Mother Goose &#8211; 111<br />
Preakness &#8211; 108<br />
Kentucky Oaks &#8211; 108</p>
<p>For comparative purposes here are some other recent 3 yo filly champs and their top Beyers during their 3 yo filly season:</p>
<p>2008 <strong>Proud Spell</strong> &#8211; Tops of 101, 99, 99, 97<br />
2007 <strong>Rags to Riches</strong> &#8211; Tops of 107, 104, 98, 96<br />
2006 <strong>Wait A While</strong> -Her accomplishments came on turf.  Dirt top of 90<br />
2005 <strong>Smuggler </strong>- Tops of 98, 94, 93, 92 in season that ended in July.<br />
2004 <strong>Ashado</strong> &#8211; Tops of 106, 103, 103, 102<br />
2003 <strong>Bird Town</strong> -Tops of 101, 100, 100, 100<br />
2002 <strong>Farda Amiga</strong> -Tops of 103, 103, 100, 95</p>
<p>Clearly Rachel Alexandra is FAST.  Much faster than most recent 3 year old filly champs.  When she encountered difficult pace scenarios in the Preakness &amp; Woodward she still ran faster than any recent 3 yo filly champ ran in their best effort, and under normal circumstances she was 10-15 points superior.</p>
<p>So how does she compare to some of the greats?  Well on the positive side, 116 is about as fast as it gets.  On the negative side, there are quite a few who have run figures in that range.  Here are a few examples:</p>
<p><strong>Lakeway</strong> ran a 117 winning the Hollywood Oaks.</p>
<p><strong>Surfside</strong> ran a 116 winning the Clark (alebit much later in the season)</p>
<p><strong>Silverbulletday</strong> ran a 115 in the Alabama &#8211; to go along with 109-107-108 in the Black Eyed Susan, Kentucky Oaks, &amp; Ashland.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Go For Wand:</strong></span></p>
<p>Beldame &#8211; 117<br />
Maskette &#8211; 105<br />
Alabama &#8211; 111<br />
Test &#8211; 114<br />
Mother Goose &#8211; 104</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s <strong>Xtra Heat</strong> who couldn&#8217;t do it going long, but ran sprint figures of 120, 119, 117 as a 3 yo filly.</p>
<p><strong>Very Subtle</strong> ran a 121 when she won the 1987 <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> Sprint over Groovy as a 3 year old filly.</p>
<p><strong>Miesque</strong> ran a 119 when she won the  1987 Breeders&#8217; Cup Turf Mile as a 3 yo filly.</p>
<p>I also seem to recall <strong>Mantistique</strong> running a 115 type number as a 3 yo filly at Hollywood but I have no record of it.  <strong>Winning Colors</strong> ran a similar number winning the Santa Anita Derby if memory serves, but I have no record of that either.  Winning Colors also ran a 115 in defeat losing to <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Personal Ensign</a> in the Breeders&#8217; Cup Distaff.</p>
<p>As far as older fillies &amp; mares, clearly they have run faster due to maturity, but for comparative purposes the 2 fastest Breeders&#8217; Cup Distaff&#8217;s on record belong to <strong>Princess Rooney</strong> (120) and <strong>Inside Information</strong> (119).  The great <strong>Lady&#8217;s Secret</strong> ran a 113 winning the BC Distaff but put up figures of 120 (Woodward), 119 (Ruffian), 118 (Whitney), and 116 (Maskette) in 1986.</p>
<p>&#8220;Great&#8221; is a term that is thrown around all too easily these days, but what&#8217;s the correct definition?  I define greatness as the intersection between extraordinary ability/talent and  extraordinary accomplishments.  Many horses have one of the two, but few have both.  Rachel Alexandra displayed both in her 3 yo filly season.  Her 3 yo filly season was as accomplished as any by a 3 year old filly in recent memory.  But others are accomplished too which is where the figure comparison comes into play.</p>
<p>Is Rachel Alexandra substantially more talented than horses like Ruffian, Go For Wand, Silverbulletday and Winning Colors?  Definitely not.  They&#8217;re all in the same ballpark and would likely have traded wins with each other had they regularly competed against each other.  But her accomplishments as a 3 year old filly meet or exceed what any single one of them did over the course of a season.</p>
<p>In the final tally you have a horse who was as fast as any 3 year old filly in history and accomplished as much or more than any 3 yo filly in history.   In a single race I&#8217;m not so sure she could beat a handful of history&#8217;s top fillies, but when her ability is considered collectively with her accomplishments there&#8217;s no doubt she&#8217;s great and you&#8217;d be hard-pressed to say that any single 3 yo filly was better in a combined analysis &#8211; thereby making Rachel Alexandra the best 3 year old filly ever!</p>
<p>===============================</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Fix the Breeders&#8217; Cup</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Turf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa anita]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Breeders' Cup is broken, folks.  Not irreversibly, but it's getting there.  The good thing is that it can be fixed in 3 simple steps.  Let's fix it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By this time next year, three years will have passed  since there was a single <a href="http://farewelltokings.com" target="_blank">Breeders&#8217; Cup</a> race that took place on dirt.  THREE  YEARS!!!  That&#8217;s as sad as it is unbelievable!  Some championship&#8230;  Not to mention the fact that I&#8217;ve  yet to encounter a single person who prefers the term &#8220;Ladies Classic&#8221; to  Distaff.  The various  &#8221;improvements&#8221; bestowed upon us by the erstwhile  powers-that-be have thoroughly diluted this once great event.</p>
<p>Bottom line:  The Breeders&#8217; Cup is broken, folks.  Not irreversibly, but it&#8217;s getting there.  The good thing is that it can be fixed in 3 simple steps.  Let&#8217;s fix it.</p>
<p>Since those in charge currently seem to be contemplating how to plan the event for the  future I propose the following simple and easy ground rules to restore the event to its rightful place as a day that racing fans can truly look forward to:</p>
<p>1)  <strong>The Breeders&#8217; Cup should not be a 2-day event.</strong> In this case two halves  do NOT exceed one whole.  In fact, they seldom do.  I remember when Belmont used  to run &#8220;Super Saturday&#8221; cards in the fall combining all of their major Grade 1  races into a single card.  They were exciting.  Then they tried to spread the  races out over an entire weekend.  It didn&#8217;t work.  They turned into ordinary  racing days with several stakes races run.  Racing isn&#8217;t popular enough anymore to  support too many big days.  You need to hit it out of the park when it counts.   Most of the world could give a crap about the &#8220;Ladies Classic,&#8221; let alone the  &#8220;Juvenile Fillies Turf.&#8221;  There&#8217;s simply no reason other than desperate  economics (read: short term gain, long term pain) to try to stretch the event into a Friday afternoon.</p>
<p>Run the Breeders&#8217; Cup on Saturday like they used to &#8211; with only the most  important races.  Make that card so strong that the rest of the racing world  (and some of the rest of the world as well) stops to pay attention &#8211; like they used to.  Only run races significant enough  to be Grade 1&#8242;s &#8211; like they used to.  How pathetic is it that they now run Breeders&#8217; Cup races that can&#8217;t even be called Grade 1&#8242;s with a straight face?  Isn&#8217;t there some saying about &#8220;if it ain&#8217;t  broke&#8230;?&#8221;  Here&#8217;s another thought: If you draw a field where you can&#8217;t immediately tell if  the race is being run on Breeders&#8217; Cup day or a month later at Aqueduct when looking at the entrants and past performances, then you&#8217;ve done something seriously wrong and the  race probably doesn&#8217;t deserve to be part of the Breeders Cup card!!!</p>
<p>2)  <strong>Let&#8217;s nix the marathon, turf sprint, dirt  mile, juvenile turf, and juvenile fillies turf. </strong> None of these are championship  events.  Look at the fields.  Look at the winners so far.  These are no elite  races and the horses winning these races aren&#8217;t elite horses .  The only thing the Breeders Cup was  missing was a filly &amp; mare sprint.  That&#8217;s an Eclipse Award category and  there are legit Grade 1 horses ready to run in such a race.  Keep it.  No one  was asking for any of these other races.  They don&#8217;t fill any void.  None of  these other races determine Eclipse Awards, draw G1 fields, or serve any  legitimate purpose other than to waste purse money and serve as a desperate attempt to get a second day out of the BC by calling them Breeders&#8217; Cup events.  Run these other events as  non-Breeders&#8217; Cup stakes races on the day before or day after if you must, but  stop diluting the main event with this silliness that more resemble the Calder  Festival of Racing where they run 2 furlong and 2 mile races simultaneously in opposite directions  than  they do championship events where we&#8217;ve seen some of the greatest races in the  history of the sport.</p>
<p>3)  <strong>No Breeders&#8217; Cup can be run at a track that doesn&#8217;t have dirt.</strong> I&#8217;m  sorry but it&#8217;s absolutely ridiculous to pass off an event as a determinant of  champions when not a single dirt race is run.  This is America for god sakes &#8211; here we  run on dirt!  Synthetics are a third surface and they need to be treated as  such.  Last year you saw Eclipse voters ignore most of the Breeders&#8217; Cup results  for this reason.  This year, it&#8217;s gone a step further and many top horses are  deliberately skipping the event because it&#8217;s on synthetics.  California rushed  to judgment and installed synthetic courses throughout the state.  That&#8217;s their  problem.  They made their bed and they should have to lie in it &#8211; but it doesn&#8217;t mean the rest of the sport has to suffer.  Perhaps we should create a separate Eclipse for synthetic horses (for at least as long as they last),  but let&#8217;s bring these races back to a time where they actually mattered and  actually represented a level playing field from which to settle rivalries and  help determine year-end championships.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for drastic action because you can see the downward trend developing right before you.  In a matter of 2 years they have essentially torn down all of what they spent 2 decades building up.  The Breeders&#8217; Cup is on a fast track towards being nothing more than a series of big money events with no other real value rather than the biggest day in racing and a series of &#8220;can&#8217;t miss&#8221; races (for the Eclipse contenders as well as the fans).</p>
<p>1 Day.  9 Championship races.  Dirt.  Not so hard, is it?!  All in favor, say I&#8230;</p>
<p>===============================</p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Follow me on Twitter</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/twitter.com');" href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #000080;"><strong>* Become a Facebook Fan</strong>:</span> <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/article/www.facebook.com');" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/how-to-fix-the-breeders-cup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yo Zenyatta, I&#8217;m gonna let you finish but&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/yo-zenyatta-im-gonna-let-you-finish-but/</link>
		<comments>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/yo-zenyatta-im-gonna-let-you-finish-but/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Racing Discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zenyatta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Horse of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breeders' Cup Ladies Classic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distaff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eclipse Award]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Ensign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Alexandra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a sensational 2008 campaign, Zenyatta seemed poised to step into the pantheon of racing&#8217;s most elite fillies and mares in 2009, but something happened on the way to the history books.  More like 2 things &#8211; Rachel Alexandra and a shockingly unambitious campaign.  Placed back to back, the contrast has caused Zenyatta&#8217;s plain vanilla [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a sensational 2008 campaign, Zenyatta seemed poised to step into the pantheon of racing&#8217;s most elite fillies and mares in 2009, but something happened on the way to the history books.  More like 2 things &#8211; Rachel Alexandra and a shockingly unambitious campaign.  Placed back to back, the contrast has caused Zenyatta&#8217;s plain vanilla schedule to look even worse.</p>
<p>Rachel Alexandra just concluded the most ambitious, aggressive, and challenging campaign that a top 3 year old filly has seen in this country in many years.  Top fillies and mares have repeatedly faced colts in the past (See Lady&#8217;s Secret, Winning Colors, Serena&#8217;s Song et al.) but this is a different time and culture.  Nowadays horses generally take the path of least resistance.  That&#8217;s certainly been the case with Zenyatta&#8230;and then some!  Zenyatta had a fabulous 2008.  She was undefeated, brilliant and breathtaking with her sweeping move to blow by each field at will.  She concluded with a easy win in the BC DISTAFF (That&#8217;s what it is and always will be).  She could have retired with a championship and a place in history as a very good mare.</p>
<p>Instead she returned in 2009 and with that came a chance to establish a place among the elite mares in history.  She had the opportunity to step outside the female ranks and shoot for a win or two in a major handicap race vs males.  She could have shipped and won some of the important divisional races in NY &#8211; while simultaneously establishing that she was an elite mare on dirt as well.  She could have tried the grass.  She could have done many exciting things to put her talent on display and show just where she belongs from a historical perspective.   Now here we are on October 1st and despite being in training since the spring, Zenyatta has raced just 3 times and done nothing at all outside her comfort zone.  To date her campaign falls well short of even her 2008 season where she at least shipped to Oaklawn for the Apple Blossom and made 7 starts.</p>
<p>With so many ways to do something special this year, for some inexplicable reason Zenyatta&#8217;s connections have chosen the most unexciting and least challenging schedule possible this year.  They cite the fact that the Breeders&#8217; Cup is supposed to determine year-end championships but she has already been a champion in her division &#8211; this is about becoming extraordinary, not pursuing the ordinary.  The Breeders&#8217; Cup explanation is their rationale for not running against Rachel Alexandra &#8211; whose connections likely would have taken Rachel to any dirt track in America to face Zenyatta &#8211; which comes across as nothing more than a lame excuse to avoid a showdown with a horse she likely would have lost to and who has certainly surpassed her in rank and reputation.  This also in no way addresses why she couldn&#8217;t have faced males in races like the Pacific Classic or Hollywood Gold Cup.  Heck, even her stablemate who was running on the same schedule as Zenyatta was entered against males in the Hollywood Gold Cup.  Neither does it address why she couldn&#8217;t ship outside California or run a race of two on dirt to diversify her resume and legacy.  When reigning horse of the year Curlin retured for a 2008 campaign last year, his connections took him to Dubai, Kentucky, tried him on grass, won major races in New York and concluded in California.  Looking back at a champion whose unbeaten record Zenyatta is presently targeting, Personal Ensign faced males in the Whitney and twice beat a Kentucky Derby winning filly to conclude her career.    And here is Zenyatta &#8211; facing and beating an extraordinarily weak group of older mares in California time after time while her connections apparently have no desire to test her further.</p>
<p>Certainly Zenyatta&#8217;s connections are free to manage their horse any way they&#8217;d like, but should she conclude her career with 2 more wins to break Personal Ensign&#8217;s record, history will surely take into account how she was managed.  If their goal was to simply ensure that Zenyatta retired undefeated, well then they are indeed doing a masterful job of managing her.  But you can&#8217;t have it both ways.  Taking the path of least resistance by avoiding challenges and never venturing outside her comfort zone &#8211; particularly in the face of such an aggressive and exciting campaign from Rachel Alexandra by contrast &#8211; will surely prevent Zenyatta from ranking alongside the all-time greats of the sport.  She may indeed have that level of talent, but her connections have done an incredible disservice to her reputation and legacy by failing to allow her to demonstrate it on the track.  </p>
<p><strong>Follow me on Twitter</strong>: <a href="http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog">http://twitter.com/FTKRacingBlog</a></p>
<p>
<strong>Become a Facebook Fan</strong>: <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?">http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/Farewell-To-Kings-Horse-Racing-Blog/153345362804?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/yo-zenyatta-im-gonna-let-you-finish-but/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

