<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Rachel Alexandra the Best Filly Ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 13:59:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-218</guid>
		<description> 
And yes you are correct, Zenyatta will be judge for his Breeders 10 furlong Classic because very few FEMALES ever enter or run in an OPEN GRADE 1 at the CLASSIC DISTANCE OF 10 furlongs.
That is why Rachel never entered one OPEN G1 @ the classic distance of 10 furlongs, she cannot compete in those kind races. She is basically an extended sprinter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
And yes you are correct, Zenyatta will be judge for his Breeders 10 furlong Classic because very few FEMALES ever enter or run in an OPEN GRADE 1 at the CLASSIC DISTANCE OF 10 furlongs.<br />
That is why Rachel never entered one OPEN G1 @ the classic distance of 10 furlongs, she cannot compete in those kind races. She is basically an extended sprinter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-217</guid>
		<description> 
Darell you need to get a grip, BEYER IS HIGHER FOR SHORTER DISTANCES. that is why Groovy got a very high beyer 130 for his 6 furlong sprint. And Rachel is nothing more than an extended sprinter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
Darell you need to get a grip, BEYER IS HIGHER FOR SHORTER DISTANCES. that is why Groovy got a very high beyer 130 for his 6 furlong sprint. And Rachel is nothing more than an extended sprinter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-216</guid>
		<description> 
Rachel is basically a 9f horse...just because she got 9.5 does not mean she is a classic distance horse...that is why they ducked the 2009 10 furlongs Breeders Classic. Her Personal Ensign exposed her distance limitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <br />
Rachel is basically a 9f horse&#8230;just because she got 9.5 does not mean she is a classic distance horse&#8230;that is why they ducked the 2009 10 furlongs Breeders Classic. Her Personal Ensign exposed her distance limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 04:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-215</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Not sure I&#039;ve ever heard a 3 year old filly who is able to win a triple crown race be called distance limited...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You might also find this interesting:  Guess how many races Zenyatta  won at 9 furlongs or more?  SEVEN.  Guess how many races Rachel  Alexandra won at 9 furlongs or more?  SEVEN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rachel wasn&#039;t distance limited - it&#039;s all a function of pace.  She simply suffered in the late stages of any race where she battled through an especially hot early pace (as any horse would).  Just as Zenyatta struggled to run down far inferior competition in races with a slow early pace. The fact that Rachel held on to win in the Preakness and Woodward given the  pace scenarios is a testament to just how talented she was.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Beyers aren&#039;t higher for shorter distances.  They&#039;re equivalent  across all distances.  It simply requires more talent and more endurance to run higher  Beyers at longer distances.  Virtually every horse can sprint, much  fewer can be as good going long.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If history judges Zenyatta ahead of Rachel it will be because of her Breeders&#039; Cup Classic performances and Rachel&#039;s poor 4 year old season.  3 year old Rachel Alexandra would have been heavily favored over any year&#039;s version of Zenyatta had they faced each other and justifiably so.  Rachel&#039;s 3 year old season was the most impressive of any 3 year old filly in history and far more powerful than any individual season Zenyatta ever had.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I&#8217;ve ever heard a 3 year old filly who is able to win a triple crown race be called distance limited&#8230;</p>
<p>You might also find this interesting:  Guess how many races Zenyatta  won at 9 furlongs or more?  SEVEN.  Guess how many races Rachel  Alexandra won at 9 furlongs or more?  SEVEN.</p>
<p>Rachel wasn&#8217;t distance limited &#8211; it&#8217;s all a function of pace.  She simply suffered in the late stages of any race where she battled through an especially hot early pace (as any horse would).  Just as Zenyatta struggled to run down far inferior competition in races with a slow early pace. The fact that Rachel held on to win in the Preakness and Woodward given the  pace scenarios is a testament to just how talented she was.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Beyers aren&#8217;t higher for shorter distances.  They&#8217;re equivalent  across all distances.  It simply requires more talent and more endurance to run higher  Beyers at longer distances.  Virtually every horse can sprint, much  fewer can be as good going long.</p>
<p>If history judges Zenyatta ahead of Rachel it will be because of her Breeders&#8217; Cup Classic performances and Rachel&#8217;s poor 4 year old season.  3 year old Rachel Alexandra would have been heavily favored over any year&#8217;s version of Zenyatta had they faced each other and justifiably so.  Rachel&#8217;s 3 year old season was the most impressive of any 3 year old filly in history and far more powerful than any individual season Zenyatta ever had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Rachel is distance limited and Beyers are higher for shorter distances.
That is why Zenyatta will rank up there with Ruffian and Personal Ensign but Rachel won&#039;t even make the top 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel is distance limited and Beyers are higher for shorter distances.<br />
That is why Zenyatta will rank up there with Ruffian and Personal Ensign but Rachel won&#8217;t even make the top 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much...I appreciate it.  Glad you enjoyed the article &amp; hope you&#039;re enjoying the blog overall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much&#8230;I appreciate it.  Glad you enjoyed the article &amp; hope you&#8217;re enjoying the blog overall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://farewelltokings.com/2009/10/is-rachel-alexandra-the-best-filly-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farewelltokings.com/?p=203#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Love your analysis!  Great job,  for a great filly!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love your analysis!  Great job,  for a great filly!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

